ZORA Airdrop Disaster: Early Users "HODL" for Four Years, Average Per Person Less Than $40

By: blockbeats|2025/04/25 16:30:02
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Zora Airdrop Faces On-Chain Backlash: Early Users Feel Betrayed, Average Airdrop Only $37"
Original Author: Nancy, PANews

After years of anticipation, the long-awaited Zora airdrop finally took place. However, community members who had eagerly awaited this moment were left disappointed. Upon opening their wallets, all they found was a reward that couldn't even cover the gas fee, let alone a token with no utility. The community's emotions reached a boiling point, and the on-chain reputation protocol Ethos unexpectedly became the outlet for users to express their dissatisfaction. Zora's "car crash scene" was permanently recorded on the blockchain, leaving a mark of shattered trust.

Airdrop Backfires on Early Users, Token Distribution Accused of Abandoning the Community

Last month, Zora announced the upcoming launch of its native token, ZORA, creating high expectations within the community that had been waiting for years. In the days leading up to the airdrop, Base, the official platform, issued a series of tweets to hype up Zora, attracting a lot of attention with various memes and skyrocketing data metrics.

However, this airdrop turned out to be a massive disappointment. On April 23, Zora opened the airdrop claiming to distribute 1 billion ZORA tokens to 2,415,024 addresses. Most of the airdropped tokens were based on the first snapshot distribution (from January 1, 2020, 8:00, to March 3, 2025, 22:00), with a smaller portion based on the second snapshot distribution (from March 3, 2025, 22:00, to April 20, 2025, 8:00), which also covered activity on Zora's latest Coins protocol. The specific distribution amounts were calculated based on user activity on Zora and their overall participation in the current protocol and its older versions, including but not limited to minting, trading, and referrals.

Simultaneously, the ZORA token was listed on Binance Alpha, with eligible users receiving a 4276 ZORA token airdrop. However, this airdrop result angered many long-time participants in the Zora ecosystem, as they received only a small amount of tokens, barely enough to cover the gas fee.

Recent speculators and Binance Alpha users easily walked away with a large number of tokens. This severe imbalance in distribution not only sparked widespread anger in the community but was also seen as a betrayal of early supporters. What exacerbated the community's dissatisfaction was that the Zora airdrop snapshot was divided into two parts, yet the specific distribution criteria were never made public, leading to a lack of transparency throughout the process.

Moreover, Zora has also faced strong community scrutiny due to its highly concentrated and opaque distribution ratio. According to Zora's disclosed tokenomics, the community airdrop accounts for only 10%, while the team, treasury, and strategic contributors allocation stands at a high 65%, with a mere 6-month lock-up period before unlocking commences, and the specific unlocking schedule is similarly not clearly stated.

Furthermore, the Zora team has officially stated that the ZORA token is merely a "just for fun" MEME coin, carrying no technical or governance functions, primarily used for community rewards and ecosystem incentives. This positioning has sparked a series of questions from the community: Since the token does not have any substantial utility, why does the team still need to occupy such a high percentage? And on what basis does the community trust that ZORA holds long-term value?

ZORA Airdrop Disaster: Early Users

Amidst multiple disappointments, Ethos's negative review feature has been seen as an outlet for emotional value expression, with community users leaving "downvotes" en masse, leading to a rapid decline in Zora's credibility score. Many users have been outspoken, stating, "On-chain records are immutable; malicious projects must be recorded in history."

Airdrop Progress: Over Halfway with User Claim Rate Below 20%, Average User Receives Only $37

In terms of price performance, Binance data shows that after ZORA was listed, it briefly surged to $0.0466, only to plummet to a low of $0.0172 the next day, a nearly 63% decline, cooling off the market hype rapidly.

According to Dune data, as of the time of writing, over 514 million tokens have been successfully claimed by users in the ZORA airdrop. Among them, the top 50 addresses have collectively claimed more than 190 million tokens, with an average of about 3.931 million tokens per address. Based on the current price (approximately $0.0235), this is worth around $9,200, accounting for 36.9% of the total claimed amount. This indicates a significant concentration of distribution toward the top wallet addresses.

At the same time, in terms of the number of participating users, there are already over 320,000 users participating in the claim, but the average user has only claimed 1,571.1 ZORA, equivalent to about $37. This stark contrast highlights the extreme imbalance in the distribution structure—large holders receive a substantial airdrop, while regular users receive a very limited allocation.

In terms of claim progress, approximately 51.42% of the total token supply has been claimed, but only 13.35% of eligible users have actually completed the claim process, further indicating that the proportion of users actively claiming is very low, with most users tending to forego claiming.

Significant Drop in User Engagement as Controversy Arises over Transition to On-Chain Social

Founded in 2020, Zora was originally positioned as an NFT marketplace protocol. Public data shows that the project has raised at least $52 million in funding, with investment firms including Coinbase Ventures, Paradigm, Haun Ventures, among others, with the latest funding round valuing the project at $6 billion. However, as the NFT market cooled off and competition intensified, Zora gradually evolved to focus on on-chain social and the creator economy ecosystem, including the introduction of the "Coins" feature, which automatically mints each piece of social content (such as images, videos, text) into an ERC-20 token, and the launch of its own Layer2 network, Zora Network.

Despite continuously exploring new narrative directions, the overall ecosystem activity of Zora has significantly declined. According to Dune data, as of April 24, the total smart contracts created on the Zora network have exceeded 3.51 million, but looking at the daily contract creation numbers, the data has dropped from the early peak of 144,000 transactions to around 13,000 transactions, which is less than ten percent of the peak; similarly, the cumulative transaction volume on the Zora network has surpassed 87.4 million transactions, however, the daily transaction volume has dropped from a historical peak of 3.338 million transactions to the current approximately 428,000 transactions; although the total number of active addresses has reached 470,000, comparing to the daily active users of about 259,000 at the peak last year, it has now decreased to 50,900, showing a decrease in user engagement.

In terms of revenue, according to DeFiLlama and Dune data, Zora's accumulated revenue is only $5.4 million, and Zora Network's profit is only 527.74 ETH. It is also believed by the community that this is far from the market expectations corresponding to its $6 billion valuation.

Furthermore, although Zora claims to have brought tens of millions of dollars in revenue to creators, its on-chain experimental and tokenized narrative has sparked controversy. For example, Jesse Pollak, the head of Base Protocol, recently praised the record-breaking active users of Zora Coins, but ZachXBT criticized these tokens as "viruses," with a market cap of less than $5 million. In response, Jesse admitted that most content is nearly worthless, with a small amount of content having huge value, but ZachXBT questioned why creators would issue a large number of tokens to dilute their brand. Jesse rebutted that on-chain creation does not dilute the brand, good content will naturally spread, and the market and algorithms determine its value.

Overall, Zora is attempting to reshape itself through on-chain social interactions and tokenized storytelling, but its overinflated valuation and increasingly cooling ecosystem have long planted the seeds of a trust crisis. This lackluster airdrop may very well be the final straw that breaks the community's confidence.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.