Why is the U.S. Embracing Crypto? The Answer May Lie in $37 Trillion Debt

By: blockbeats|2025/12/25 12:00:02
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Russia Says U.S. Planning $37 Trillion Crypto Reset
Original Article Author: Andrei Jikh
Original Article Translation: Dingdang, Odaily Planet Daily

At the recent Eastern Economic Forum held in Russia, one of Putin's closest advisors made a statement that sparked widespread attention. He stated that the United States is preparing to utilize cryptocurrency and stablecoins to devalue its massive $37 trillion national debt in an almost imperceptible manner.

His claim is that the U.S. is plotting to "move" this debt into a cryptographic system, achieving a systemic reset through what is referred to as a "crypto cloud," with the ultimate outcome being that other countries around the world foot the bill for this.

At first glance, this may sound like some kind of crazy theory. However, similar viewpoints have emerged before. MicroStrategy founder and billionaire Michael Saylor has previously publicly presented a highly controversial suggestion to Trump: sell all of America's gold and buy ="/wiki/article/bitcoin-btc-42">Bitcoin with the proceeds. By completely emptying the gold reserves and using the same funds to purchase 5 million bitcoins, you would effectively demonetize the entire gold asset class. Meanwhile, our rival nations happen to hold significant gold reserves. Their assets will tend to zero, while ours will expand to $100 trillion, enabling the U.S. to control both the global reserve capital network and the reserve currency system.

However, the question remains: Is this feasible? Is it really possible?

YouTuber Andrei Jikh, who has 2.93 million followers, dissected this in a video: What did Putin's advisor really say? And how could the U.S. potentially devalue its $37 trillion debt through stablecoins and Bitcoin? Odaily Planet Daily has compiled and translated the key points from this video.

The first question is: Who made these remarks?

The speaker is named Anton Kobyakov, a senior advisor to Russian President Putin who has been in office for over a decade. He is primarily responsible for articulating Russia's strategic narrative on important occasions like the Eastern Economic Forum.

In his speech, he explicitly stated: the United States is attempting to rewrite the rules of the gold and crypto markets, with the ultimate goal of propelling the global economic system into what he calls the "crypto cloud." Once the global financial system completes this transition, the U.S. can embed its massive national debt into structures of digital assets such as stablecoins, and then achieve a de facto "debt wipeout" through devaluation.

Second Question: What Does "Debt Devaluation" Actually Mean? How Does It Work?

Let's use an extremely simplified example to understand. Suppose the entire world's wealth is only worth a $100 bill. I borrowed this $100 and now owe the world's entire wealth, which I must repay.

The problem is, if I were to honestly repay the debt, I would have to return that $100 exactly as it was. However, luckily, I have a special "superpower" — I control the world's reserve currency issuance.

So, instead of returning the original $100, I magically print a new $100 out of thin air.

What is the result? The total currency in circulation in the world has changed from $100 to $200, but the quantity of goods, houses, and resources in the world has not increased.

As a result, the prices of everything begin to rise: properties, stocks, gold, especially things people desire, all become more expensive; what once cost $1 now requires $2. Everything becomes more expensive, but the supply of goods remains the same. This is inflation.

Now, when I return "that $100" to you, on the surface, I have fully repaid the debt, but in reality, the money you receive has lost half its purchasing power. I did not default, but I achieved debt devaluation through currency dilution.

Stablecoins Are Now Replicating This Old Script

However, what many people fail to realize is: this is one of the oldest and most common methods of debt repayment in human history. This is also how the United States has always repaid its debts.

Debt devaluation does not imply default and does not mean non-repayment. It merely reduces the real value of the debt through inflation or currency manipulation.

And this method has occurred time and time again throughout history. Post-World War II, in the heavy inflation of the 1970s, after the pandemic with massive money printing, all the same.

So, when a Russian advisor says that "the US might devalue its debt with cryptocurrency," he is not revealing any new mechanism but describing a method that the US has long been adept at.

The real innovation is: stablecoins that can diffuse this mechanism globally.

What needs to be clarified is: this is not about "directly converting the $37 trillion into stablecoins," but using USD stablecoins backed by US Treasuries to distribute the US debt structure to global holders. When the US dollar is diluted through inflation, the loss is shared by all holders of these stablecoins.

I want to mention something extremely important, which is also a foundational economic fact that many people overlook, and this is Jeff Booth's view: the natural state of the economy is actually deflationary. This means that if the world has only a fixed amount of currency, over time, with technological progress and increased production efficiency, goods will naturally become cheaper. Price deflation is the natural order. But reality is different, and the world we live in does not operate this way. There is only one reason: governments can create currency indefinitely.

When new money enters the system, this liquidity must "find a home" so it does not become worthless. Therefore, it is injected into assets such as real estate, stocks, gold, and Bitcoin. This is also why, in the long run, these assets seem to always be rising. But in reality, they are just maintaining their purchasing power, while the currency that underpins everything is becoming weaker. It's not that the assets are rising, but that the dollar is devaluing.

The True Value of Stablecoins: Distribution + Control

The question is, what if you could expand this superpower? What if you could scale the same trick internationally? This is where stablecoins come into play.

If the US can already devalue debt through regular inflation, what more can stablecoins do? The answer is two words: distribution + control.

Because when there is domestic inflation in the US, the economic pain is immediate: we see higher grocery bills, higher real estate prices, rising energy costs, and possibly higher interest rates to cool it down, with CPI and consumer price index reports rising, the US population becomes dissatisfied.

But stablecoins are different. Because stablecoins typically hold reserves in short-term US Treasuries, the demand for the US dollar and US Treasuries can actually increase as stablecoin adoption grows, making the whole thing self-reinforcing. When USDT, USDC are widely used globally, they are essentially holding a digital IOU backed by US Treasuries. This means that US debt financing is "virtually outsourced" to global users.

So, if the United States devalues its debt through inflation, the burden will fall not only on US citizens but it will also be "exported" globally through the stablecoin system. Thus, inflation becomes a kind of tax that all global stablecoin holders are collectively forced to bear. Because their digital dollars have also lost purchasing power. From a technical standpoint, today's system is the same. The dollar is ubiquitous around the world, but stablecoins will become a larger market and will exist on people's smartphones.

Another piece of the puzzle is that stablecoins can appear neutral because they can be created by private companies, not just the government. This means they do not come with the political baggage associated with the Fed or Treasury. Under the ENDCA, only approved issuers such as banks, trust companies, or non-bank companies that can receive special approval can issue regulated, dollar-backed stablecoins in the United States.

If Apple or Meta were willing, they could theoretically issue their own currency, such as the so-called "Metacoin." What is truly needed is not a technological breakthrough but rather political permission. To put it bluntly, as long as you show favor to the power core and invest enough capital, it is possible to obtain a license.

It is for this reason that stablecoins play such a crucial role in the U.S. debt dilution process. Essentially, they provide a level of control close to that of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) but without the need to carry the highly sensitive global label of CBDC.

The Fatal Flaw of Stablecoins: Unverifiable Trust

But the problem is that other countries in the world do not buy into this. We have already seen this from the continuous large-scale buying of gold by central banks around the world.

Stablecoins claim to be pegged 1:1 to the dollar or U.S. Treasury bonds, theoretically, each circulating stablecoin should be backed by $1 in cash or an equivalent Treasury asset. But the real issue is: Neither individuals nor foreign governments can independently audit these reserves with 100% certainty.

Tether, Circle will issue reserve reports, but you must trust the issuer itself and you must trust the auditing entities, and almost all of these entities are within the U.S. system. When it comes to a trust issue involving trillions of dollars, this itself poses an extremely high barrier for nations.

Even if future blockchain technology could achieve real-time, transparent audits of stablecoin reserves, it still wouldn't solve a more fundamental issue — the U.S. always has the power to change the rules.

History has already provided a clear warning. The U.S. government once promised that the U.S. dollar could be redeemed for gold at any time, but in 1971, the Nixon administration unilaterally cut off this redemption option. From a global perspective, this was essentially a complete "rule reversal": the commitment remained, but redemption was ended by a "joking" remark.

Therefore, a digital token system built on "trust us" is unlikely to truly gain the world's trust. Technically, there is nothing to prevent the U.S. from making a decision in the future regarding stablecoins similar to the one where the U.S. unpegged the dollar from gold. This is the fundamental reason why there is widespread caution globally towards the new generation of digital currency systems.

So, the next question is: Will the U.S. actually do this in the end?

In my view, not only is this possibility real, it's even inevitable, as the U.S. has been experimenting with this idea, just not in the way we might think.

For example, Michael Saylor has publicly advocated to Trump and his family, proposing that the U.S. establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve. His vision was: if the U.S. were to sell gold, then massively buy Bitcoin, it could not only suppress the price of gold, weaken competitors like China and Russia, but also drive up the price of Bitcoin, reshaping the U.S. balance sheet.

However, this did not ultimately happen. Instead, during Trump's tenure, this idea of a U.S. Bitcoin reserve was merely mentioned and never truly materialized. U.S. officials have explicitly stated that they will not use taxpayer funds to purchase Bitcoin, at least not in a public capacity, and indeed, no related actions have been seen. So, I believe it will not happen in the way Michael Saylor publicly suggested.

However, this does not mean the story ends there. Because the government doesn't necessarily have to get involved directly to be part of it. The real "backdoor approach" lies in the private sector.

MicroStrategy has effectively become a "Bitcoin publicly traded company," under Michael Saylor's leadership continually accumulating Bitcoin, with their current holdings totaling hundreds of thousands of coins. So the question arises: If a public company were to first complete large-scale Bitcoin accumulation, would it be safer and more discreet than the government buying in directly?

This approach would neither be seen as central bank intervention nor immediately trigger global market panic. And when Bitcoin is truly established as a strategic asset, the U.S. government can easily gain Bitcoin exposure indirectly through equity stakes and holdings, just as it once held partial ownership of companies like Intel; this precedent already exists.

Instead of openly selling gold, engaging in billion-dollar Bitcoin trades, or forcefully promoting a stablecoin system, the smarter and more in-line-with-its-style approach for the U.S. is to let private enterprises conduct experiments first. Once a model is proven effective and significant to ignore, then the nation can absorb and institutionalize it at a federal level.

This method is more discreet, gradual, and offers more "plausible deniability" until one day, everything officially emerges.

Therefore, the key point I want to convey is: there are many ways for this to happen, and it is highly likely to happen. The assessment of that Russian advisor is not groundless—If the U.S. does indeed attempt to fundamentally address its national debt issue, then some form of digital asset strategy is almost an inevitable choice.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more