Unveiling the Crypto VC Network: Who Is Joining Forces to Build the Next Unicorn?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/18 18:15:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Networks in Crypto VC
Original Author: @Decentralisedco, Web3 Consulting Firm
Original Translation: 律动小 deep

Editor's Note: The article explores the network relationships in crypto venture capital, analyzing how VCs choose co-investors and historical investment patterns. Researchers revealed which funds frequently co-invest, how their investments perform, and how large funds support their portfolio companies through follow-on funding. The article emphasizes that understanding VC networks and co-investment habits can help founders optimize their fundraising strategy, while pointing out that capital is increasingly concentrating in a few top funds, co-investment relies more on partner relationships than fund brands, and the future may evolve towards private equity.

The following is the original content (slightly restructured for better readability):

We studied how crypto venture capital selects co-investors and the historical patterns in their investment strategies. The tools mentioned in the article can be accessed here.

As an asset class, venture capital follows an extreme power law distribution. However, the extent of this phenomenon has not been fully researched as we are always caught up in chasing the latest market narrative. As a founder, understanding which VCs frequently co-invest can save time and optimize your fundraising strategy. Each transaction is like a fingerprint, and once we visualize them as graphs, the underlying story can be revealed.

In other words, we can track the nodes responsible for a majority of the funding in the cryptocurrency space. We try to find the "ports" in the modern trading network, similar to merchants from a millennium ago.

We believe there are two reasons why this is an interesting experiment:

1. We operate a somewhat "fight club" like VC network. No one is really throwing punches (at least not yet), but we also don't talk about it much publicly. This VC network includes about 80 funds. Across the entire crypto VC space, around 240 funds have invested over $500,000 in seed-stage rounds. This means we directly engage with about 1/3 of the funds, and nearly 2/3 of the funds read our content. This coverage exceeds my expectations, but that's the current state of affairs.

Nevertheless, tracking who actually invests where remains quite challenging. Sending founder updates to each fund would turn into noise. The emergence of this tracking tool is to filter out which funds have invested in which areas and with whom they co-invest.

2. For a founder, understanding capital flows is just the first step. More importantly, it is crucial to comprehend how these funds have performed and with whom they typically co-invest. To figure this out, we calculated the historical probability of a fund's portfolio companies receiving follow-on funding post their investment, although data tends to become murky in later stages (such as Series B) as companies often opt for token issuance rather than traditional equity financing.

Assisting founders in identifying active investors in cryptocurrency venture capital is the first step. The next is understanding which funding sources have shown better performance. Once we have this data, we can explore which co-investments by funds can lead to the best outcomes. Of course, this is not rocket science. No one can guarantee a Series A funding with just one check, just like no one can guarantee marriage after the first date. However, understanding the landscape you are stepping into, be it in dating or risk financing, can be highly beneficial.

Building Success

We used some basic logic to identify funds in the portfolio that have participated in the most follow-on funding rounds. If a fund's multiple companies receive funding post-seed round, they have likely done something right. Venture capital sees an increase in investment value when a company raises the next round at a higher valuation. Therefore, follow-on funding is a good indicator of performance.

We selected the top 20 funds in the portfolio with the most follow-on funding rounds and then calculated the total number of companies they invested in at the seed stage. You can effectively calculate the founder's probability of receiving follow-on funding from this. If a fund invested in 100 companies at the seed stage, out of which 30 received follow-on funding within two years, we would calculate the follow-on funding "graduation probability" as 30%.

The limitation here is that we set a strict two-year time filter. Typically, startups may choose not to raise funds at all or may do so much later.

Unveiling the Crypto VC Network: Who Is Joining Forces to Build the Next Unicorn?

Even among the top 20 ranked funds, the power law distribution is quite extreme. For instance, receiving funding from A16z means you have a 1/3 chance of raising another round within two years. In other words, for every three startups backed by A16z, one will proceed to a Series A round. Considering the probability on the other end is 1/16, this is quite a high graduation rate.

For funds closer to the 20th rank (in this top 20 follow-on funding list), the probability of their portfolio companies receiving follow-on funding is 7%. These numbers might seem similar, but for context, a 1/3 probability is like rolling a die and getting a number less than 3, while a 1/14 probability is roughly equivalent to the chance of having twins. These are vastly different outcomes, both literally and probabilistically.

Joking aside, this illustrates the level of concentration within cryptocurrency venture capital funds. Some venture funds may even strategize follow-on funding for their portfolio companies as they also have growth-stage funds. Therefore, they will invest in the same company in both the seed round and Series A. When a venture fund doubles down on an investment in the same company, it often sends a strong signal to later-stage investors. In other words, whether a venture firm internally has a growth-stage fund significantly impacts the company's likelihood of success in the coming years.

In the long run, cryptocurrency venture capital may evolve into private equity investments for revenue-generating projects.

We have a theoretical argument for this transition. But what do the data actually show? To investigate this, we looked at the number of startups in our investor group that received follow-on funding. We then calculated the percentage of companies where the same venture fund participated again in subsequent funding rounds.

In other words, if a company received seed funding from A16z, what is the probability that A16z will reinvest in their Series A?

A pattern quickly emerged. Larger funds managing over $1 billion tend to engage in follow-on investments more frequently. For example, 44% of startups in A16z's portfolio had A16z participate in follow-on rounds when they raised additional funding. Blockchain Capital, DCG, and Polychain made follow-on investments in a quarter of the companies that received follow-on funding in their portfolios.

In other words, who you raise from in the seed or pre-seed round is much more critical than you might think, as these investors often tend to consistently support their companies.

Habitual Co-Investment

These patterns are the result of post hoc observations. We are not implying that companies funded by non-top-tier VCs are destined to fail. The ultimate goal of all economic activity is either growth or profit creation. Startups that can achieve both functions will see their valuations rise over time. However, increasing the probability of success certainly helps. If you cannot secure funding from these top 20 funds, one way to improve the odds is through their networks. In other words, connect to these hubs of capital.

The image below shows the network relationships of all venture capitalists in the cryptocurrency space over the past decade. There are 1000 investors sharing approximately 22,000 connections. When one investor co-invests with another, a connection is formed. It may look crowded, even like too many options.

However, this includes funds that have already closed, never returned capital, or are no longer investing.

I know, it's messy.

The following image provides a clearer view of the future direction of our market. If you are a founder looking to raise a Series A round with a fund size of over $2 million, there are approximately 50 funds. The investor network participating in these rounds consists of around 112 funds. These funds are increasingly inclined towards consolidation, showing a stronger preference for co-investing with specific partners.

Seed Round to Series A Investor Ocean

It appears that over time, funds have developed a habit of co-investing. This means that when one fund invests in an entity, it often brings along another peer fund, either due to complementary skills (such as technical expertise or marketing assistance) or based on partner relationships. To understand how these relationships work, we began exploring the co-investment patterns between funds over the past year.

For example, in the past year:

· Polychain and Nomad Capital had 9 shared co-investments.

· Bankless and Robot Ventures had 9 shared co-investments.

· Binance and Polychain had 7 shared co-investments.

· Binance also had 7 shared co-investments with HackVC.

· OKX and Animoca had 7 shared co-investments.

Larger funds are becoming increasingly selective about co-investors.

· For example, out of Paradigm's 10 investments last year, Robot Ventures participated in 3.

· In its total of 13 investments, DragonFly shared 3 rounds with Robot Ventures and Founders Fund.

· Similarly, Founders Fund had 3 co-investments with Dragonfly out of its total of 9 investments.

In other words, we are transitioning to an era where a small number of funds are making large investments, there are fewer co-investors, and these co-investors are often well-established, reputable funds.

Entering the Matrix

Another way of analyzing data is by studying the behavior of the most active investors. The matrix above considers the most frequently investing funds since 2020 and how their relationships unfold. You will notice that joint investments between accelerators (such as Y Combinator or Outlier Venture) and exchanges (such as Coinbase Ventures) are rare.

On the other hand, you will also find that exchanges typically have their own preferences. For example, OKX Ventures and Animoca Brands have a high degree of joint investments. Coinbase Ventures has over 30 joint investments with Polychain and 24 with Pantera.

What we observe are three structural tendencies:

1. Despite a high investment frequency, joint investments between accelerators and exchanges or large funds are scarce, possibly due to different stage preferences.

2. Major exchanges show a strong preference for growth-stage venture funds. Currently, Pantera and Polychain lead in this aspect.

3. Exchanges tend to collaborate with local players. OKX Ventures and Coinbase exhibit distinct joint investment preferences, highlighting the global nature of Web3 capital allocation.

So, as venture funds consolidate, where does the next marginal capital come from? I have noticed an interesting pattern: corporate ventures have their own clusters. For instance, Goldman Sachs has had 2 joint investment rounds historically with PayPal Ventures and Kraken. Coinbase Ventures has 37 joint investments with Polychain, 32 with Pantera, and 24 with Electric Capital.

Unlike venture capital, corporate pools of capital typically target growth-stage companies with significant product-market fit. Therefore, as early-stage risk financing declines, the behavior of this pool of capital still needs to be observed.

The Evolving Network

Excerpt from "Squares and Towers"

A few years ago, after reading Niall Ferguson's "The Square and the Tower," I became interested in exploring the relationship networks within cryptocurrency. This book revealed how the spread of ideas, products, and even diseases is tied to networks. It wasn't until a few weeks ago when we built a funding dashboard that I realized visualizing the connected network of cryptocurrency capital sources was possible.

I believe that such a dataset and the economic interactions between these entities could be used to design (and execute) mergers and token M&A. We are internally exploring both of these. They could also be used for business development and partnership initiatives. We are still researching how to allow specific companies access to this dataset.

But let's get back to the point at hand.

Can networks really help funds achieve alpha returns?

The answer is somewhat complex.

The ability for a fund to select the right team and provide substantial capital will become increasingly important, surpassing its connections with other funds. However, what truly matters are the personal relationships between General Partners (GPs) and other co-investors. Venture capital doesn't share deal flow with brands; they share it with people. When a partner switches funds, these relationships simply transfer to the new fund.

I have an intuition about this, but the means to validate this argument are limited. Luckily, a study in 2024 examined the performance of the top 100 VCs over time. In fact, they looked at 38,000 funding rounds involving 11,084 companies, even breaking down the market by seasonality. Their key points can be summarized as follows:

1. Past co-investments do not necessarily imply future collaborations. If previous investments failed, a fund may choose not to work with another fund again.

2. During boom times, co-investments often increase as funds seek to deploy capital more aggressively. VCs rely more on social signals during a boom, reducing due diligence. In bear markets, funds are cautious in deployment, usually investing solo due to lower valuations.

3. Funds select partners based on complementary skills. Therefore, having investors with the same expertise crowded in a round typically spells trouble.

As I mentioned before, ultimately, co-investments happen at the partner level, not at the fund level. Throughout my career, I have seen individuals switch between different institutions. The goal is often to work with the same person, regardless of which fund they join. In an age where AI is taking over human jobs, knowing that relationships are still the bedrock of early-stage venture capital is reassuring.

There is still much work to be done on how cryptocurrency venture capital networks are formed. For example, I am interested in studying the preferences of hedge funds in capital allocation, or how late-stage cryptocurrency deployment evolves with market seasonality, or how M&A and private equity play into this. The answers are in our data today, but it will take time to pose the right questions.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more