The mysterious team that dominated Solana for three months is now launching their own coin on Jupiter?
An anonymous team with no official website or community has devoured nearly half of the transaction volume on Jupiter in just 90 days.
To delve deeper into this mysterious project, we must first witness an ongoing on-chain transaction revolution happening on Solana.
HumidiFi accounts for 42% of Jupiter's transaction volume
Source: Dune, @ilemi
How Proprietary AMMs Are Restructuring On-Chain Transactions
In the context of AMMs, toxic order flow refers to high-frequency arbitrageurs leveraging low-latency connections and advanced algorithms to preemptively capture price differentials and swiftly arbitrage the price delta between on-chain and price-discovery venues (typically centralized exchanges like Binance). The profits taken by these toxic order flows are ultimately borne by traders, liquidity providers, and on-chain market makers.
In traditional financial markets that utilize a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) to match trades, professional market makers can cope with toxic order flow in various ways (such as adjusting spreads or pausing quotes). By analyzing order flow patterns, they can identify traders with an informational edge and adjust quotes accordingly to mitigate losses caused by adverse selection. Therefore, market makers operating on Solana naturally opted for DEXes like Phoenix that employ a CLOB. However, during Solana's "meme frenzy" period from 2024 to early 2025, the Solana network, overwhelmed by unprecedented demand, struggled to handle market maker orders, and updating quotes required significant expensive computation, leading to a steep increase in market makers' costs.
A series of thorny practical issues is compelling a cohort of the most seasoned AMM market makers to fundamentally rethink how on-chain markets operate, giving rise to a revolutionary new market structure.
This new paradigm is known as a Proprietary AMM (Prop AMM), aiming to provide lower spreads and more efficient liquidity on-chain while minimizing the risk of exploitation by high-frequency arbitrageurs.
SolFi, ZeroFi, and Obric were the initial triumvirate of Proprietary AMMs, which did not expose contract interfaces publicly but instead directly provided interfaces to major trading routes like Jupiter and demanded that Jupiter route orders to their AMMs. This design makes it extremely difficult for external professional arbitrageurs like Wintermute to directly interact with the contracts as they cannot comprehend or predict the trading logic, thereby preventing the replacement of market maker quotes and the adverse selection problem of informational advantaged entities.

In February 2025, SolFi, ZeroFi, and Obric were the three main proprietary AMMs.
Source: Dune @the_defi_report
HumidiFi's Blitzkrieg
The competition among proprietary AMMs had heated up by July 2025, and a project called HumidiFi rapidly reshaped the entire market landscape.
HumidiFi officially launched in mid-June 2025, and just two months later, it had captured 47.1% of all proprietary AMM trading volume, establishing itself as the undisputed market leader. In contrast, the former dominator SolFi saw its market share plummet from 61.8% two months prior to 9.2%.

Source: Dune @the_defi_report
HumidiFi's dominance was particularly evident in the SOL/USDC trading pair. On October 28th, HumidiFi processed $1.08 billion in SOL/USDC trades in a single day, accounting for 64.3% of that day's total volume for the pair.

Source: Dune @the_defi_report
HumidiFi also exhibited a high penetration rate in the Jupiter routing. As an aggregator that holds an 86.4% market share on Solana, Jupiter's routing choices largely dictate traders' actual experiences. Data from October 20th showed that HumidiFi held a market share of 46.8% in Jupiter, more than four times that of the second-place TesseraV (10.7%).

Source: Dune @the_defi_report
Zooming out to the entire self-custody AMM ecosystem, HumidiFi's dominance remains strong. On October 28, the total trading volume of all self-custody AMMs reached $21.8 billion, with HumidiFi alone occupying $13.5 billion, accounting for a significant 61.9%. This number not only far exceeds the second-place SolFi's $3.09 billion but even surpasses the total trading volume of competitors ranked 2-8.

Source: Dune @the_defi_report
This victory of HumidiFi was achieved almost in complete "stealth" mode. It had no official website, no early Twitter account, and no information about team members was ever disclosed.
HumidiFi doesn't need marketing, airdrops, or storytelling. It only needs to provide better price spreads and execution prices than its competitors in every transaction. When Jupiter's routing algorithm repeatedly chose HumidiFi, the market had already cast its vote in its own way.
The Race to the Limits of Speed and Cost
The key to HumidiFi's success lies in compressing the computational cost of oracle updates to the extreme and cleverly converting this technological advantage into absolute market dominance through the Jito auction mechanism.
Firstly, HumidiFi has low resource consumption. According to data provided by @bqbrady, each oracle update of HumidiFi consumes only 799 CUs (Compute Units). In comparison, its main competitor SolFi requires 4339 CUs. TesseraV, operated by top market maker Wintermute, also needs 1,595 CUs, which is double that of HumidiFi.

Source: X, @bqbrady
HumidiFi also leveraged its advantage of low CU consumption to gain absolute transaction priority in Solana's MEV infrastructure Jito auction. In the Jito auction, transaction priority is not determined by an absolute tip but by a Tip per CU. HumidiFi pays around 4,998 lamports as a fee for each oracle update. Due to its extremely low CU consumption (799 CUs), its Tip per CU ratio reaches an astonishing 6.25 lamports/CU.

According to data provided by Brennan Watt, an engineer at Anza, a core developer of Solana, HumidiFi used 6 times less CU than the former flagship SolFi Prop AMM and paid over 8 times more in gas fees.
Another key advantage of HumidiFi is the oracle update frequency. HumidiFi updates its oracle 17 times per second, far exceeding its main competitors (SolFi at 13 times, TesseraV at 11 times, and ZeroFi at 10 times).
In the intense volatility of the cryptocurrency market, this almost real-time price tracking ability enables it to always peg near fair value, avoiding opportunities for arbitrageurs, and providing tighter liquidity without the need to self-protect through widening spreads.
Furthermore, HumidiFi has also done well in cost control. HumidiFi's daily operating cost is only $2,247. In comparison, although SolFi manages 5 times the assets under management (AUM) of HumidiFi ($80 billion vs. $16 billion), its daily cost is only 20% lower than HumidiFi at $1,785.
WET Token Launches on Jupiter DTF

During the community call on the evening of October 30, the Jupiter team announced their ICO platform DTF's inaugural launch project: HumidiFi, with the token symbol WET.

According to the disclosed demo webpage, the allocation is divided into three parts:
A whitelist (acquisition rules to be determined) can ensure a portion of the allocation.
JUP stakers can secure an allocation based on their staked amount.
The public allocation follows a first-come, first-served (FCFS) model, with immediate on-chain circulation once filled, without a lock-up period.

It is worth noting that the HumidiFi team explicitly stated on Twitter that there are "no VC allocations," which is particularly rare in the current market environment dominated by VC presales and low-circulating high FDV projects.
Proprietary AMM is a "winner-takes-all" race, and HumidiFi has achieved its dominant position today based on its technological prowess. However, this also means that once a new competitor makes a breakthrough in CU efficiency or oracle speed, it could quickly erode its market share. This Prop AMM war is clearly just beginning.
You may also like

Who's at the CFTC Table? A Rebalancing of American Fintech Discourse
AI Trading vs Human Crypto Traders: $10,000 Live Trading Battle Results in Munich, Germany (WEEX Hackathon 2026)
Discover how AI trading outperformed human traders in WEEX's live Munich showdown. Learn 3 key strategies from the battle and why AI is changing crypto trading.
Elon Musk's X Money vs. Crypto's Synthetic Dollars: Who Wins the Future of Money?
How do Synthetic Dollars work? This guide explains their strategies, benefits over traditional stablecoins like USDT, and risks every crypto trader must know.

The Israeli military is hunting a mole on Polymarket

Q4 $667M Net Loss: Coinbase Earnings Report Foreshadows Challenging 2026 for Crypto Industry?

BlackRock Buying UNI, What's the Catch?

Lost in Hong Kong

Gold Plunges Over 4%, Silver Crashes 11%, Stock Market Plummet Triggers Precious Metals Algorithmic Selling Pressure?

Coinbase and Solana make successive moves, Agent economy to become the next big narrative

Aave DAO Wins, But the Game Is Not Over

Coinbase Earnings Call, Latest Developments in Aave Tokenomics Debate, What's Trending in the Global Crypto Community Today?

ICE, the parent company of the NYSE, Goes All In: Index Futures Contracts and Sentiment Prediction Market Tool

On-Chain Options: The Crossroads of DeFi Miners and Traders

How WEEX and LALIGA Redefine Elite Performance
WEEX x LALIGA partnership: Where trading discipline meets football excellence. Discover how WEEX, official regional partner in Hong Kong & Taiwan, brings crypto and sports fans together through shared values of strategy, control, and long-term performance.

Best Crypto to Buy Now February 10 – XRP, Solana, Dogecoin
Key Takeaways XRP is set to revolutionize cross-border transactions, potentially reaching $5 by the end of Q2 with…

Kyle Samani Criticizes Hyperliquid in Explosive Post-Departure Market Commentary
Key Takeaways: Kyle Samani, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital, publicly criticizes Hyperliquid, labeling it a systemic risk. Samani’s…

Leading AI Claude Forecasts the Price of XRP, Cardano, and Ethereum by the End of 2026
Key Takeaways: XRP’s value is projected to reach $8 by 2026 due to major institutional adoption. Cardano (ADA)…

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Alarming New Research Cautions Millions in BTC at Risk of ‘Quantum Freeze’ – Are You Ready?
Key Takeaways Quantum Threat to Bitcoin: The rise of quantum computing presents a unique security challenge to Bitcoin,…
Who's at the CFTC Table? A Rebalancing of American Fintech Discourse
AI Trading vs Human Crypto Traders: $10,000 Live Trading Battle Results in Munich, Germany (WEEX Hackathon 2026)
Discover how AI trading outperformed human traders in WEEX's live Munich showdown. Learn 3 key strategies from the battle and why AI is changing crypto trading.
Elon Musk's X Money vs. Crypto's Synthetic Dollars: Who Wins the Future of Money?
How do Synthetic Dollars work? This guide explains their strategies, benefits over traditional stablecoins like USDT, and risks every crypto trader must know.
HumidiFi accounts for 42% of Jupiter's transaction volume