Rejecting the "Security Theater": Wallet Security is Entering the Era of Verifiability

By: blockbeats|2025/12/17 17:30:05
0
Share
copy
Source: OKX

By 2025, Web3 will enter a new stage of "larger scale, higher-frequency usage," and wallets will accelerate their evolution from a "coin storage tool" to a chain-entry and transaction operating system. Market research firm Fortune Business Insights estimates that the cryptocurrency wallet market will reach around $12.2 billion in 2025 and may grow to $98.57 billion by 2034.

User-side expansion is also evident: a16z crypto estimated in the "State of Crypto 2025" that there are approximately 40-70 million active crypto users, with about 716 million crypto asset holders who "hold assets but may not necessarily be active on-chain"; Crypto.com Research's report also states that the global crypto holders increased from 681 million in the first half of 2025 to 708 million.

On the flip side of the increasing scale and penetration rate is the simultaneous amplification of security risks. It is no longer just about "whether the smart contract has vulnerabilities" but about intercepting risks at the user's critical points, such as clicking on links, connecting wallets, signing authorizations, and processing transactions.

In the on-chain world, the "attack surface" often extends beyond smart contract vulnerabilities and is more commonly related to low-barrier phishing, fake domains, impersonation of customer service, and authorization fraud as "pre-transaction risks." For example, Chainalysis defines "crypto drainers (wallet emptiers/phishing authorization tools)" as tools that do not steal account passwords but instead deceive users into connecting their wallets and approving malicious transaction authorizations, allowing assets to be drained directly. Public data also shows that in 2024, losses related to "wallet drainers" were close to the $500 million mark.

Therefore, enhancing the security of Web3 wallets will no longer focus solely on whether smart contracts have vulnerabilities but will need to pay further attention to how to proactively intercept risks at key user behavior points, known as "pre-transaction security."

In such an industry context, "security" is becoming increasingly challenging to address with a simple slogan but instead resembles a governance capability that needs continuous validation: whether it can be verified, whether it can be traced, and whether it can be disclosed in a timely manner are becoming important criteria for users in choosing a wallet.

From "Security Claims" to "Understandable Security Capability List"

For a long time, when wallet projects discussed security, common rhetoric included "we have undergone audits," "we have a whitepaper," and "we focus heavily on risk management." However, with the industrialization of scams and phishing, this "security claim" is losing its persuasiveness. The moment users truly encounter issues often happens in very brief interactions such as clicking on links, connecting wallets, and signing authorizations. The "crypto drainers" described by Chainalysis are a typical path: attackers disguise themselves as a legitimate page, guide users to complete authorization, and then transfer the assets; their research even mentions cases of forging Magic Eden pages and carrying out malicious transactions targeting Ordinals users.

Public data is also driving the industry narrative towards "understandability." Security Week, citing Scam Sniffer's statistics, reported that in 2024, nearly $500 million in losses were caused by wallet emptiers, with over 332,000 victims. These types of events do not require attackers to breach complex systems but rather rely more on users not understanding the risks during interactions. On the other hand, Chainalysis, in its 2025 disclosure, estimated that in 2024, on-chain scam revenue was at least $9.9 billion and could increase as more addresses are identified. When the main risk comes from the "user-side readability gap," wallet manufacturers must shift security from backend engineering to front-facing expression.

As a result, more and more wallets in the industry are starting to "productize" their security capabilities: they no longer just tell you "we are secure" but break down protective actions into a list that users can understand—such as which tokens will be flagged as high risk, which transactions will trigger alerts, which addresses or DApps will be blocked, and why the blocking is happening. The essence of this change is to transform security from a "qualification narrative" to an "interaction narrative": enabling users to receive actionable information before signing, rather than having to look at an audit PDF afterwards.

Following this trend, the newly launched and upgraded Security Center page of the OKX wallet provides a more typical example of "expressing in a list format." The page explicitly outlines three "frontline defenses" aimed at users: Token risk detection, Transaction monitoring, and Address screening, and explains their functions in a single sentence each, such as "Flagging high-risk tokens to reduce exposure to honeypots and bad actors," "Cross-chain real-time monitoring to identify suspicious on-chain activities," and "Intercepting interactions with malicious DApps and addresses." The benefit of this approach is that even if users do not understand security terminology, they can quickly relate to the action they are currently taking—whether to click, sign, or transfer.

Rejecting the


Click to visit: OKX Wallet Security Landing Page Audit Report

More importantly, "understandability" does not mean "talking to oneself." On the same page, the OKX wallet also provides an "View audit reports" link, connecting the "capability list" with "third-party verification." Furthermore, the audit report collection page in its help center further elaborates on the audit scope, number of issues found, and repair status, allowing users to transition from "understanding capabilities" to "verifying evidence" when needed.

This kind of transition from "security claim" to "understandable checklist" is not about making security sound grander, but about making security more actionable: as fraud increasingly relies on deception and disguise, whether a wallet can place risk alerts at interaction points, explain in user-friendly language "where the danger lies, why it's dangerous, and what you should do," is becoming part of security capability and increasingly determines whether users will stumble at a crucial step.

Audit Information "Publicly Verifiable": Transforming Third-Party Endorsement from "Linked" to "Verifiable Evidence Chain"

   

In the wallet industry, audits have long faced a practical problem: many projects have indeed "undergone audits," but the information is scattered across announcements, PDFs, and social media reposts, making it difficult for ordinary users to quickly understand "who audited it, what was audited, whether any issues were fixed, and when was it last updated." This time, the more prominent action by the OKX wallet is to consolidate publicly available third-party audit reports into a unified portal and directly indicate on the page "published on November 11, 2022, updated on November 17, 2025," allowing users to quickly determine at a glance that this is not just a one-time showcase but an ongoing information disclosure window that is actively maintained.

From the entries publicly displayed on this collection page, the scope of disclosure has not only focused on the traditional audit target of "smart contracts." Taking CertiK's entry dated May 23, 2024, as an example, the audit content clearly covers key code paths on the mobile end and frontend: including iOS/Android components, frontend ReactJS UI components, JS controllers interacting with the keyring, and multiple wallet SDK modules, while also providing the audit methodology and conclusion criteria.

In the same page, SlowMist's entry is closer to the "new paradigm" of wallet evolution in the past two years—auditable objects such as AA smart contract accounts, MPC keyless wallets, Ordinals transaction modules are all listed; in addition, audit information on the "private key security module" is separately presented, stating directly "private keys or mnemonic phrases are only stored on the user's device and are not transmitted to external servers," responding to the user's core concerns about key security with clearer boundary descriptions.

The value of this "centralized display" is not only in having more comprehensive information but, more crucially, in binding "new capabilities" with "verifiability" at the same entry point: as the wallet industry increasingly moves towards complex architectures such as AA and MPC, what users need most is not just a statement saying "we are very secure" but evidence that can be quickly verified—whether the audit scope covers critical modules, what the methodology is, whether risks have been mitigated, and if the information is consistently updated.

Furthermore, according to the OKX Wallet, after this upgrade, new audit reports and related information can be directly updated through configuration without the need for a new release. If this mechanism can operate stably in the long term, it effectively shortens the "externally verifiable" path, saving not only development and release costs.

For users, this means that when an audit is added or completed, the public entrance can more quickly reflect the "latest status," reducing the uncertainty of "having to rely on forwarding screenshots/old links" during key risk windows. For third-party observers and researchers, it is easier to form a traceable timeline: which modules completed the audit when, what level of issues were discovered, when the fixes were confirmed and publicly updated. This turns "third-party endorsement" into a continuously auditable evidence chain, rather than a one-time display of a PDF.

This article is a contributed submission and does not represent the views of BlockBeats.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.