Paradigm Bets on Brazil: The New Battlefield for Stablecoins Isn't in the US

By: blockbeats|2025/12/17 12:00:04
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "Why Did Paradigm Invest in a Brazilian Stablecoin Company?"
Original Article Author: Eric, Foresight News

Recently, the Brazilian stablecoin company Crown completed a $13.5 million Series A funding round led by Paradigm, valuing the company at $90 million. In a news release by The Block, it was explicitly emphasized that this was Paradigm's first investment in a Brazilian company. This funding round also marks Crown's second round of funding completed within two months. In mid-October, Crown had just closed an $8.1 million seed round led by Framework Ventures, with participation from Coinbase Ventures and Paxos, among others.

While this may not be front-page news, there are two points in the news that are worth noting: Why Crown? And why Brazil?

Why Invest in Crown?

Analyzing a matter often requires considering both internal and external factors.

On the external front, the author believes that investment opportunities for U.S.-based stablecoin issuers are few and far between. Tether and Circle have already captured the vast majority of the market, making it necessary for investment institutions to target external markets to seek greater alpha. There are also few targets that allow foreign capital to invest in companies related to the national fiat currency and have a market for stablecoins domestically.

Brazil is a rare "treasure trove" on the American continent that meets most of the conditions. As for why, we'll get to that later.

First, let's talk about Crown. According to disclosed data, the total supply of the Brazilian real (BRL)-pegged stablecoin BRLV issued by Crown currently slightly exceeds 100 million coins, equivalent to less than $20 million in value, with a trading volume of only 56,000 in the past 30 days. It is evident that the market for Brazil's domestic currency stablecoin is not large at the moment, not to mention that Crown is currently only targeting institutional clients.

Clearly, the logic behind investing in Crown is to bet that the team behind it can achieve success in this market in the future.

Crown's co-founder and CEO John Delaney previously served as a lawyer in the international finance field and was also the COO of the well-known Brazilian company Xerpa, which received investment from Founders Fund. Xerpa launched an "Earned Wage Access" platform in 2019, allowing employees to access their earned wages for days worked at any time (rather than waiting until the end of the month), helping to avoid high-interest credit. This is particularly popular in Brazil's high-interest rate and financial pressure environment and is seen as an employee financial well-being tool. The company charges a fixed small fee and does not involve interest.

Co-founder and Chief Engineer Vinicius Correa is an early engineer at the Brazilian digital bank Nubank. Nubank's investor lineup is also quite impressive, with participation from top-tier institutions in a total of $20 billion worth of multi-round financing, including Sequoia Capital, Tiger Global, Goldman Sachs, Founders Fund, Tencent, Berkshire Hathaway. Nubank went public on the NYSE in 2021 with an IPO valuation of $41.5 billion, currently valued at nearly $80 billion.

Founding Partner and Ecosystem Lead Alex Gorra previously served as a Managing Partner at the family office Brainvest, managing $5 billion in assets, and has held positions at ARX Investments, UBS Group, Rothschild Bank, and JPMorgan's management. COO Bruno "BL" Passos has led cross-functional teams at Hashdex.

Crown's founding team can be described as a bona fide dream team, with both founders having been involved in taking Brazilian local businesses from 0 to 1. Although BRLV's data currently may not look good, it did not prevent them from raising a total of over $20 million within two months.

Furthermore, the Crown team stated in their blog that the launch of BRLV essentially stems from seeing the contributions of USDT and USDC in purchasing government bonds. Issuing stablecoins locally in Brazil can also provide purchasing power for government bonds, thereby stabilizing the economy and, in turn, further stimulating the use of stablecoins, which is a win-win situation. If the US dollar stablecoin is only helping the United States "live on," then the Brazilian real stablecoin can be said to have solidly helped the country.

Why Bet on Brazil?

When it comes to the stablecoin's underlying fiat currency, there seem to be many better options than the Brazilian Real, but why choose Brazil?

You may not believe it when you hear it, the last time you heard about this country might have been due to football if you're from the 80s or 90s. However, it has become one of Latin America's largest and globally leading innovation hubs, with over 1,500 fintech companies and over 100 million users.

As a capitalist country, Brazil's banking sector has long been dominated by five major banks (Itaú, Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Caixa, Santander), with assets accounting for over 80%, far higher than the United States (around 50%). Traditional banking services are rigid, costly (credit card annual interest rates often exceed 300%), and bureaucratic, leading to tens of millions of low- and middle-income individuals and the unbanked (historically up to 55 million) being excluded from the system.

However, this has also created a significant demand gap. Fintech companies like Nubank entered the market with fee-free credit cards, providing simple, low-cost services and quickly filling the market gap.

Although the Central Bank of Brazil cannot change the monopoly of traditional banks, it unexpectedly took the initiative to promote competition and inclusivity. It even became a classic case of global digital financial regulation. Its biggest contribution was the launch of the instant payment system Pix in 2020. Pix supports free, 24/7 real-time transfers, with a transaction volume exceeding a trillion reais by 2025, covering over 90% of the population. Pix quickly replaced cash and credit cards upon launch, becoming the preferred payment method for 76% of Brazilians. This significantly increased financial inclusion and provided Fintech companies with low-cost infrastructure (such as integrating Pix for payments and credit innovation).

I'm sure you often see in the news of the Web3 industry various exchanges or Crypto payment tools integrating with Pix. It is indeed quite a challenging feat for a capitalist country's central bank to lead the launch of a payment system that is sufficient to shake the existing banking system, but this "people-benefiting" direction has also allowed local Fintech companies to have better development prospects by reaching more users.

It is for this reason that new financial forms like cryptocurrency have been highly accepted in Brazil. With a population of over 200 million, a smartphone penetration rate of nearly 90%, over 180 million internet users, and an average internet usage time of over 5 hours per day, Brazil's young, digital-native population, especially the Z generation, has a strong demand for mobile finance. Last September, Circle directly started supporting the exchange of the real for USDC.

The popularity of the US dollar stablecoin in Brazil has been analyzed by many articles as being due to the instability of the Brazilian national currency. However, based on the author's investigation from various sources, even if this reason is considered, it only accounts for a very small part. Now, it appears that if this reason were valid, investment firms like Paradigm would not have focused so heavily on Brazilian national fiat stablecoins and Fintech companies.

In fact, Brazil did experience severe hyperinflation multiple times in the 1980s and 1990s, even reaching extreme situations with monthly inflation rates of 80%. However, in recent years, although the real's volatility is still significant, for a country like Brazil, it has achieved good results in stabilizing its currency value and reducing inflation. Brazil's inflation rate hovered between 4.5% and 5% in 2025, still higher than the central bank's target but much better compared to neighboring Argentina.

Indeed, a portion of local residents in Brazil holding USD stablecoins are hedging against the devaluation of the real, especially against the backdrop of the Fed's interest rate hikes in recent years. However, many more do so for practical purposes such as foreign trade, tax evasion, facilitating capital flow, and trading cryptocurrencies.

According to Chainalysis data, Brazil ranks fifth globally in cryptocurrency adoption index, following India, the United States, Pakistan, and Vietnam. Its cryptocurrency inflows from July 2024 to July 2025 reached $318.8 billion, leaving other Latin American countries far behind.

Paradigm Bets on Brazil: The New Battlefield for Stablecoins Isn't in the US

According to data provided by the cryptocurrency market maker Gravity Team, Brazil has embraced stablecoins as a tool for investment and cross-border payments, with stablecoins currently accounting for about 70% of the indirect flow of funds from Brazilian local exchanges to international exchanges.

At this point, some may ask, since Brazil already has a national payment tool like Pix, what is the significance of stablecoins?

An unmentioned feature of Crown's BRLV, highlighted in a press release, is that it shares national bond interest income with stablecoin holders, and in Brazil, this number is 15%. Although it may not be feasible to distribute the full amount to holders, even half would be a very attractive yield.

In the future, BRLV can also integrate with the Pix system. For ordinary people or even the impoverished, there may be no motivation to exchange stablecoins. However, for the affluent, stablecoins not only do not affect payments, but simply holding them can generate interest income. In the future, they can seamlessly trade with USD stablecoins, participate in DeFi, and undoubtedly, various imaginative scenarios will create enough demand and use cases for stablecoins in this land.

For most countries with weak national strength, unable to sustain long-term stability of their own currency, and with limited foreign exchange reserves, the US dollar and USD stablecoins are a lifeline for the people. Brazil, however, is an exception to this.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.