FDUSD Depegging Crisis: Justin Sun Accuses FDT of $456M Fraud, the Latter Denies Insolvency

By: blockbeats|2025/04/03 10:45:02
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Justin Sun Accuses FDT of $456 Million FDUSD Fraud: An In-Depth Look"
Original Author: CryptoLeo, Odaily Planet Daily

At 11:00 PM on April 2nd, TRON Foundation founder Justin Sun made a post accusing the stablecoin FDUSD issuer, First Digital Trust (FDT), of insolvency and inability to fulfill customer fund redemptions. As a result, FDUSD experienced a severe but temporary depegging, with the FDUSD/USDT pair on Binance dropping to a low of 0.87, and FDUSD/USDC momentarily falling to 0.76.

As one of the most important stablecoins on the Binance platform, FDUSD was also the entry ticket for users participating in the Binance Launchpool activity after BUSD. Many people held a certain amount in their hands. As panic spread, some users chose to sell at a discount. However, ultimately, with Binance founder Changpeng Zhao speaking out to refute the claims, the FDUSD price rebounded strongly from the bottom and eventually stabilized at 0.987 USDT.

At 5:00 AM on April 3rd, Binance officially stated that, based on the recent completed audit, the stablecoin FDUSD had achieved 1:1 reserve backing. However, users were not convinced. They redirected their anger over losses towards Binance, questioning the long announcement delay and alleging that important news was first notified in the "whale community," causing discontent in the market.

The Odaily Planet Daily has summarized the events as follows.

Justin Sun Issues Late-Night Post Accusing FDUSD Issuer First Digital Trust (FDT) of Insolvency

Justin Sun stated: "The stablecoin FDUSD issuer First Digital Trust (FDT) is actually insolvent and unable to fulfill customer fund redemption obligations. I strongly recommend that users take immediate action to protect their assets and urge regulatory bodies and law enforcement agencies to promptly address these issues to prevent further significant losses."

In the previous days, Justin Sun had been releasing messages indicating that a "major industry event" was forthcoming on April 3rd. The pre-released version seen on social media was an invitation letter from Justin Sun, hinting at an event in Hong Kong uncovering an international financial fraud case, involving traditional financial institutions in Hong Kong and Web3 platforms.

At this point, Justin Sun's actions in the past few days seem to have some connection, acting as a kind of "appetizer before the main course of industry news."

Impacted by his post, FDUSD briefly dropped below $0.9, hitting a low of $0.8726. On Binance, FDUSD/USDT dropped to a minimum of 0.87, and FDUSD/USDC momentarily fell to 0.76.

Binance's Clarification: The Lawsuit Involves TUSD, Not FDUSD

However, amidst the FUD surrounding FDUSD, a small incident occurred. Wintermute took a different approach and, through on-chain analysis by Ai Yi, it was observed that within 20 minutes of Justin Sun's post, Wintermute withdrew a total of 31.36 million FDUSD from Binance in 4 transactions, becoming the largest FDUSD holder outside of Binance, with approximately 65.46 million tokens, representing around 2.5% of the total circulation.

FDUSD Depegging Crisis: Justin Sun Accuses FDT of 56M Fraud, the Latter Denies Insolvency

Of course, Wintermute was merely arbitraging FDUSD, and its actions did not trigger a rebound in FDUSD. Users are still eagerly awaiting Binance's response. Initially, Binance's Sisi stated in a certain group that FDUSD can be redeemed 1:1 and suggested that Justin Sun's post may be related to some past issues between FDT and Justin Sun's previous projects.

Subsequently, Binance co-founder He Yi also posted on X, saying, "This event is due to Justin Sun's lawsuit with TUSD, not FDUSD."

However, many retail investors, driven by panic, sold off their FDUSD holdings, and under the words of an official Binance representative, began to slowly stabilize. Users criticized Binance for responding first in a group chat rather than issuing an official announcement. In response to this, He Yi mentioned that the Binance team is also in contact with FDUSD, and any announcements should come from them rather than Binance. Binance has conducted thorough auditing, but the core issue lies in the legal dispute between Justin Sun and FDT, which Binance is not fully clear about.

The TUSD Saga: FDT's "Misconduct" and Justin Sun's Intervention

Coindesk also promptly published an article confirming the previous dispute between Justin Sun and FDT. FDT not only serves as the issuer of FDUSD but also as the asset manager of TUSD.

The story dates back to 2020 when, in December 2020, TrueCoin handed over the management of TrueUSD to the Hong Kong-based trustee organization First Digital Trust (FDT). In subsequent court filings, it was revealed that FDT engaged in some misconduct:

1. FDT invested the stablecoin reserves in the Aria Commodity Finance Fund (Aria CFF) registered in the Cayman Islands. However, approximately $456 million was misappropriated to an unauthorized independent entity, Aria DMCC, based in Dubai (both entities being controlled by a married couple). The plaintiff alleges that the funds transferred to Aria DMCC were blatant misappropriation and money laundering, unauthorized by the plaintiff.

2. First Digital CEO Vincent Chok was accused of transferring approximately $15.5 million in undisclosed commissions to an entity named "Glass Door" and separately providing around $15 million in unauthorized trade finance loans from FDT to Aria DMCC, which were later retrospectively misclassified as legitimate fund investments.

Subsequently, FDT's CEO, Chok, denied any wrongdoing or involvement in any fraudulent scheme. He stated that FDT acted solely as a trustee intermediary, executing transactions strictly according to the instructions provided by Techteryx and its representatives, without being responsible for independently assessing or advising on these investment decisions.

Justin Sun's dispute with FDT also comes into play here. Due to FDT's "investment and misuse," when Techteryx attempted to redeem its investment from Aria CFF between mid-2022 and early 2023, it almost failed to recover the funds, with Aria-related entities facing accusations. Justin Sun intervened during this period, providing emergency liquidity support for TUSD, which was structured as a loan.

Justin Sun's primary involvement with TUSD is often seen in his actions of minting TUSD, converting it to stUSDT, and depositing it into JustLend. JustLend has been a significant use case for TUSD, allowing users to pledge TUSD for other assets. Currently, the circulating supply of TUSD exceeds 495 million, with approximately 167 million on the TRON network, ranking second in terms of proportion.

Currently, $456 million of the funds have not been returned, and Justin Sun's loan remains outstanding.

FDT Late-Night Space and FDUSD Audit Report

Returning to FDUSD, as mentioned earlier, the clarification regarding FDUSD should be done by FDT. One of FDT's accounts, First Digital, also conducted a "Statement Regarding Justin Sun's False Accusations" Space on X. FDT CEO Vincent Chok interacted with users in real-time to answer questions. After summarizing by Odaily, Vincent Chok's responses can be divided into several points:

1. Justin Sun's accusation stems from an ongoing legal case involving TUSD that has been ongoing for over two years (as mentioned in a previous CoinDesk article). I'm not sure why this matter is being brought up now. Furthermore, Hong Kong companies are all following legal and regulatory compliance;

2. We will not go bankrupt. We have third-party asset verification, which is right on the official website for everyone to check at any time. The reserve is more than sufficient and can support immediate 1:1 FDUSD redemption;

3. Our funds and client funds are completely separated. Clients have their funds in our operated FDD accounts. If we become insolvent, client fund reserves will not be affected;

4. We are a fully regulated entity. We have passed all compliance checks, such as AML and KYC, and have partnerships with banks that are very satisfied with us. I cannot control the FUD outside. But in reality, the way to sustain in this industry is to ensure full transparency for our clients and users.

After the Space ended, Odaily visited their official website to view the reserve proof. In the reserve proof announced by FDT in March, the reserve proof for February showed that as of 9:00 AM HKT on March 1, 2025 (9:00 PM ET on February 28, 2025)

FDUSD Total Circulation: 2,041,924,819.94 coins, Total Reserve Assets for FDUSD: $2,051,348,188.70, with the reserve assets consisting of:

1. Total Holding of U.S. Treasury Bills: $1,733,452,142.60 (approximately 84.5% of total)

2. Overnight Reverse Repo Agreements (Overnight Reverse Repo Agreements) Position: $33,000,000.00 USD (approximately 1.6% share)

3. Fixed Deposits Position: $145,880,000.00 USD (approximately 7.1% share)

4. Cash in U.S. Dollars Account Cash Balance: $139,016,046.10 USD (approximately 6.8% share)

In other words, if the reserve proof is completely accurate, FDUSD is redeemable at a 1:1 ratio.

Stablecoin Being Slashed Again? Sun Yige's Feud with FDT, Retail Investors Holding the Bag

Finally, Justin Sun once again issued a statement emphasizing that FDT has gone bankrupt and indicated that everything will be decided by the judicial and regulatory authorities.

As of the time of writing, Justin Sun's statements have not provided any additional significant evidence, and the court case regarding "Techteryx's lawsuit against FDT" is still ongoing. This FUD against FDUSD can be considered mostly resolved. While FDUSD has not fully restored its peg, it has gradually re-anchored above $0.98. Due to the previous UST incident, many users are very cautious about stablecoin de-pegging, with most fleeing at the first sign of FUD, and some even selling at the lowest point before the rebound.

It seems like today is April Fools' Day: FDUSD is back around $0.98, Justin Sun is still emphasizing FDT's bankruptcy, FDT litigation is ongoing, and Binance still supports FDUSD, but your money is 10% less.

As mentioned earlier, the community has many users questioning why Binance only came out on social media to clarify the FDUSD incident once FDUSD had fallen below $0.90. They believe it was to let retail investors cut losses at the bottom while allowing exchange whales to buy the dip.

In response, Heco co-founder He Yi mentioned that the official announcement of FDUSD requires a process, including verification and time. Binance's Sisi only made the judgment that FDUSD can be redeemed 1:1 after seeing some people panic selling in the group and feeling sorry for them.

According to the Hong Kong press conference by Justin Sun at 1:30 PM on April 3, there is less than 10 hours remaining. Odaily will continue to track and report on the relevant developments from the conference.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more