Ethereum's Identity Crisis: Cryptocurrency or Bitcoin's Shadow?

By: blockbeats|2025/12/18 17:00:01
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: The ETH Debate: Is it Cryptomoney?
Original Article Author: @AvgJoesCrypto, Messari
Translation: Luffy, Foresight News

Among all mainstream cryptocurrency assets, Ethereum has sparked the most intense debate. While Bitcoin has been widely recognized as the leading cryptocurrency, Ethereum's position has always been in question. To some, Ethereum is seen as the only credible non-sovereign monetary-like asset apart from Bitcoin; while others believe Ethereum is fundamentally a business that has seen declining revenues, tightening profit margins, and faces fierce competition from many other public chains offering faster transactions and lower costs.

Ethereum's Identity Crisis: Cryptocurrency or Bitcoin's Shadow?

This debate seemed to reach its peak in the first half of this year. In March, Ripple (XRP) briefly surpassed Ethereum in fully diluted valuation (notably, all Ethereum tokens are in circulation, while only about 60% of Ripple's total supply is circulating).

On March 16th, Ethereum's fully diluted valuation was $227.65 billion, while Ripple's equivalent valuation reached $239.23 billion. This result was almost unimaginable a year ago. Subsequently, on April 8th, 2025, Ethereum's exchange rate to Bitcoin (ETH/BTC) fell below 0.02, hitting a record low since February 2020. In other words, Ethereum has completely retraced all its gains relative to Bitcoin from the previous bull run. At that time, market sentiment towards Ethereum hit rock bottom.

To make matters worse, the price decline was just the tip of the iceberg. As competitors' ecosystems flourished, Ethereum's share of the on-chain fee market continued to shrink. In 2024, Solana made a comeback; in 2025, Hyperliquid emerged. Together, the two pushed Ethereum's fee market share down to 17%, ranking it fourth among public chains—a cliff-like drop from its top spot a year ago. While fees may not tell the whole story, they are a clear signal of economic activity flow. Today, Ethereum is facing the most challenging competitive landscape in its development history.

However, historical experience has shown that significant reversals in the cryptocurrency market often begin at the most pessimistic moment of market sentiment. When Ethereum is pronounced by the outside world as a "failed asset," most of its apparent decline has already been absorbed by market prices.

In May 2025, signs of market overbearishness towards Ethereum began to emerge. It was during this period that Ethereum experienced a strong rebound in both its exchange rate against Bitcoin and its price in USD. The Ethereum-to-Bitcoin exchange rate climbed from a low of 0.017 in April to 0.042 in August, representing a 139% increase. During the same period, Ethereum's USD price surged from $1646 to $4793, marking a 191% increase. This upward trend peaked on August 24th when the price of Ethereum reached $4946, setting a new all-time high. After this reevaluation of value, Ethereum's overall trajectory clearly returned to an upward trend. The Ethereum Foundation's leadership transition and the emergence of a group of treasury companies focused on Ethereum injected confidence into the market.

Prior to this round of growth, the diverging fortunes of Ethereum and Bitcoin were vividly reflected in the exchange-traded fund (ETF) markets for both. In July 2024, an Ethereum spot ETF was launched, but its fund inflows were very weak. In the first six months post-listing, its net inflow was only $2.41 billion, showcasing a stark contrast to the record-breaking performance of the Bitcoin ETF.

However, with Ethereum's strong recovery, concerns about its ETF fund inflows dissipated. Looking at the entire year, the net inflow of the Ethereum spot ETF reached $9.72 billion, while the Bitcoin ETF reached $21.78 billion. Considering that Bitcoin's market cap is nearly five times that of Ethereum, the disparity in the scale of ETF fund inflows is only 2.2 times, much lower than market expectations. In other words, when adjusted for market cap size, the market demand for Ethereum ETFs actually exceeds that of Bitcoin. This result completely reversed the narrative that "institutions lack genuine interest in Ethereum." Moreover, during specific time periods, the inflow of funds into the Ethereum ETF even surpassed Bitcoin directly. From May 26th to August 25th, the net inflow into the Ethereum ETF was $10.2 billion, exceeding the $9.79 billion for the Bitcoin ETF during the same period, marking the first clear tilt of institutional demand towards Ethereum.

Looking at the performance of ETF issuers, BlackRock continued to lead the market. By the end of 2025, BlackRock's Ethereum ETF holdings reached 3.7 million ETH, representing 60% of the Ethereum spot ETF market share. Compared to the year-end 2024 holding of 1.1 million ETH, this marked a 241% increase, with an annual growth rate far exceeding other issuers. Overall, the Ethereum spot ETF's holdings at the end of 2025 were 6.2 million ETH, accounting for approximately 5% of its total token supply.

Behind Ethereum's strong rebound, the key driver has been the rise of Ethereum treasury companies. These reserve vaults have created unprecedented stable and sustained demand for Ethereum, providing support that narrative-driven or speculative funds cannot match. If Ethereum's price action marks a clear inflection point, then the continued accumulation by treasury companies represents a profound, structural shift that brought about this turning point.

By 2025, Ethereum treasury companies had accumulated 4.8 million Ethereum, representing 4% of its total supply, significantly impacting Ethereum's price. Among them, the most prominent performer is Bitmine led by Tom Lee (stock code BMNR). This company, originally focused on Bitcoin mining, began converting its reserve funds and capital to Ethereum in July 2025. From July to November, Bitmine acquired a total of 3.63 million Ethereum, holding 75% of the market share in the Ethereum treasury company market.

Despite Ethereum's strong rebound, the upward momentum eventually cooled off. As of November 30, Ethereum's price had retraced from its August high to $2,991, even lower than the previous bull market's peak of $4,878. While Ethereum's situation has significantly improved from its April low, this round of rebound has not completely dispelled the structural concerns that initially triggered market pessimism. On the contrary, the controversy surrounding Ethereum's positioning is once again in the public eye with even more intensity.

On one hand, Ethereum is exhibiting many features similar to Bitcoin, which are key to Bitcoin's ascent as a monetary asset. Today, Ethereum ETF inflows are no longer weak, and the Ethereum treasury company has become a source of its sustained demand. Perhaps most importantly, an increasing number of market participants are starting to differentiate Ethereum from other altcoins, incorporating it into the same monetary framework as Bitcoin.

On the other hand, the core issues that dragged Ethereum down in the first half of this year have yet to be resolved. Ethereum's core fundamentals have not fully recovered: its share of the public chain transaction fee market continues to be squeezed by strong competitors like Solana and Hyperliquid; the transaction activity on the Ethereum base layer is still far below the peak levels of the previous bull market; despite a significant price rebound, Bitcoin has easily surpassed its all-time high, while Ethereum is still lingering below its all-time high. Even in Ethereum's strongest months, there are still many holders who see this rally as an opportunity to cash out rather than a recognition of its long-term value.

The core issue of this controversy is not whether Ethereum has value, but how the asset ETH can accumulate value from the development of the Ethereum network.

In the previous bull market, the market widely believed that ETH's value would directly benefit from the success of the Ethereum network. This is the core logic of the "Sound Money Thesis": the utility of the Ethereum network will drive a significant demand for token burning, thereby establishing a clear and mechanized value support for Ethereum assets.

Today, we can almost certainly say that this logic will no longer hold. Ethereum's fee revenue has plummeted significantly and shows no signs of recovery; meanwhile, the two core areas driving Ethereum network growth — Real-World Assets (RWAs) and the institutional market — settle in USD as their core settlement currency, not in Ethereum.

The future value of Ethereum will depend on how it can indirectly benefit from the development of the Ethereum network. However, this indirect value accumulation carries great uncertainty. Its premise is that as the systemic importance of the Ethereum network continues to rise, more and more users and capital are willing to see Ethereum as a cryptocurrency and store of value tool.

Unlike direct, mechanized value accumulation, this indirect path has no certainty whatsoever. It relies entirely on market social preferences and collective consensus. Of course, this is not a flaw in itself; but it means that Ethereum's value growth will no longer have a necessary causal relationship with Ethereum network economic activity.

All of this will bring Ethereum's controversy back to its most core contradictory point: Ethereum may indeed be gradually accumulating a monetary premium, but this premium always lags behind Bitcoin. The market once again sees Ethereum as a "leverage expression" of Bitcoin's currency attributes rather than an independent monetary asset. Throughout the year 2025, Ethereum's 90-day rolling correlation with Bitcoin remained between 0.7 and 0.9, with the rolling beta coefficient skyrocketing to multi-year highs, briefly exceeding 1.8. This means that Ethereum's price volatility far exceeds Bitcoin's, but it is also always attached to Bitcoin's trend.

This is a subtle yet crucial distinction. The currency attributes that Ethereum possesses today are still recognized by the market as rooted in Bitcoin's currency narrative. As long as the market believes in Bitcoin's non-sovereign store of value attributes, some fringe market participants will be willing to extend this trust to Ethereum. Therefore, if Bitcoin's trend remains strong in 2026, Ethereum will also recapture more lost ground.

Currently, the Ethereum treasury company is still in its early stages of development, and its acquisition of Ethereum funds mainly comes from common stock issuance. However, if the cryptocurrency market experiences a new bull market, such institutions may explore more diversified financing strategies, such as borrowing from the strategy of expanding Bitcoin holdings, issuing convertible bonds and preferred stock.

For example, a Ethereum Treasury company like BitMine can finance itself by issuing low-interest convertible bonds and high-yield preferred shares, using the raised funds to directly accumulate Ethereum, while staking this Ethereum to earn ongoing rewards. Under reasonable assumptions, the staking rewards can partially offset the bond interest and preferred share dividend payments. This model allows the treasury to continue accumulating Ethereum using financial leverage when market conditions are favorable. Assuming a full-fledged bull market for Bitcoin in 2026, this "second growth curve" of the Ethereum Treasury company will further strengthen Ethereum's high beta attribute relative to Bitcoin.

Ultimately, the current market pricing of Ethereum's monetary premium is still based on Bitcoin's trajectory. Ethereum has not yet become a standalone currency asset with independent macroeconomic fundamental support; it is merely a secondary beneficiary of Bitcoin's currency consensus, and this beneficiary group is gradually expanding. The recent strong rebound of Ethereum reflects that some market participants are willing to see it as akin to Bitcoin rather than just an ordinary public chain token. However, even during a period of relative strength, market confidence in Ethereum remains closely linked to Bitcoin's narrative of continued strength.


In summary, while Ethereum's narrative of monetization has moved beyond its fractured state, it is far from settled. In the current market structure, combined with Ethereum's high beta attribute relative to Bitcoin, as long as Bitcoin's currency narrative continues to play out, Ethereum's price is poised for significant gains. The structural demand from Ethereum Treasury companies and corporate funds will provide tangible upward momentum. However, ultimately, in the foreseeable future, Ethereum's monetization process will still be tied to Bitcoin. Unless Ethereum can achieve a low correlation and low beta coefficient with Bitcoin over an extended period, a goal it has never achieved, Ethereum's premium space will always remain overshadowed by Bitcoin's halo.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more