Ether pumps to outsiders, dumps in-house. Can Tom Lee's team still be trusted?

By: blockbeats|2025/12/23 14:30:06
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Ethereum's External Bull Run vs Internal Report Bearishness, Can Tom Lee's Team Still be Trusted?"
Original Source: Wu Talk Blockchain

If there is one person to choose as the most representative figure of Ethereum's bullish narrative for 2025, it would often be Ethereum Treasury Company BitMine's Chairman and Fundstrat Co-Founder & Head of Research Tom Lee. In multiple public appearances, he has repeatedly emphasized the undervaluation of ETH. In a recent Binance Blockchain Week on December 4, he also referred to the $3000 Ethereum as "severely undervalued" and once gave a high target price prediction of "$15,000 ETH by the end of 2025." As a Wall Street veteran, known as the "Wall Street Oracle," actively engaged in media and institutional roadshows, Tom Lee's views are often seen by the market as a sentiment indicator.

However, when the market shifted its focus from the spotlight to internal institutional documents, a reversal occurred. In the latest internal-facing 2026 outlook and strategy advice from Tom Lee's Fundstrat, a different view was presented. The baseline prediction in this report suggests a significant pullback in the first half of 2026 for crypto assets, with the target range for ETH being $1800–2000. This difference in the portrayal of "publicly bullish" versus "internally bearish" has also put Tom Lee himself and his associated firm at the center of public opinion.

Fundstrat's "2026 Crypto Outlook" Core Predictions and Insights

The report was issued by Fundstrat's analyst Sean Farrell, who is currently the Director of Digital Asset Strategy responsible for cryptocurrency research and strategic insights. The report is primarily aimed at its internally subscribed clients, with a monthly subscription fee of $249.

The report paints a short-term market outlook for internal clients that is completely different from the public opinion, anticipating a significant pullback in the first half of 2026. It predicts Bitcoin may drop to $60,000–65,000, Ethereum to $1800–2000, and Solana to $50–75. It states that these pullback levels will be good opportunities to enter long positions. If the market does not experience the expected deep correction, the team also leans towards maintaining a defensive strategy, waiting for clear signals of trend reinforcement before re-entering.

Ether pumps to outsiders, dumps in-house. Can Tom Lee's team still be trusted?

The report explains that the aforementioned pessimistic scenario is not a shift to a long-term bear market but a "strategic reset" risk management measure. Fundstrat highlights several short-term headwinds that may suppress the crypto market in early 2026, including a possible U.S. government shutdown, international trade policy uncertainty, waning confidence in AI investments, and policy uncertainties due to a change in the Fed chairmanship.

These macro factors, combined with high volatility, may trigger a valuation pullback of crypto assets in a tight liquidity environment. Fundstrat emphasizes that this adjustment is a "pullback rather than a collapse," suggesting that a sharp decline is often a prelude to a new uptrend. After digesting risks in the first half of the year, the second half is expected to see a renewed strength.

The report even provides an optimistic target for the end of 2026: Bitcoin at $115,000, Ethereum at $4,500. It specifically mentions that Ethereum may exhibit relative strength in this round of adjustment. The report points out that Ethereum has some structural advantages: there is no selling pressure from miners after transitioning to PoS consensus, unlike Bitcoin, which faces continuous selling pressure from miners; there are no potential selling pressure factors from large holders like MicroStrategy. Additionally, compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum has lower concerns about quantum computing threats.

These factors mean that Ethereum may be better able to resist selling pressure in the medium term. It is evident that the Fundstrat internal research report has a somewhat cautious tone. While still bullish in the long term, it advises internal clients to increase their cash and stablecoin holdings in the short term and patiently wait for better entry points.

Tom Lee's Publicly Optimistic Prediction for Ethereum in 2025

In sharp contrast to the internal report at Fundstrat, its co-founder Tom Lee has consistently played a "super-bull" role in public events throughout 2025, often releasing Bitcoin and Ethereum price expectations far above market reality:

Bullish at the beginning of the year on Bitcoin, as reported by CoinDesk, Tom Lee initially set a Bitcoin year-end target for 2025 at up to around $250,000. In July and August 2025, as the Ethereum price surged close to its historical high, Tom Lee publicly stated that Ethereum could hit $12,000–$15,000 by the end of 2025, calling it one of the most significant macro investment opportunities in the next 10–15 years.

In August, when he appeared on CNBC, he further raised the target price, stating that Ethereum is entering a critical turning point similar to Bitcoin in 2017. In 2017, Bitcoin started below $1,000 and, under the "digital gold" narrative, rose to $120,000, achieving a 120x increase. Due to the passage of the "Genius Bill," which paved the way for stablecoins, heralding the "ChatGPT Moment" for the crypto industry, and because the core advantages of smart contracts do not apply to Bitcoin, he predicted this was Ethereum's "2017 Moment," where a rise from $3,700 to $30,000 or higher is not out of the question.

Super Cycle Narrative: As we entered the autumn rally, Tom Lee continued to maintain an extremely optimistic stance. In a November 2025 interview, he stated, "We believe that ETH is embarking on a super cycle similar to Bitcoin's from 2017 to 2021," implying that Ethereum has the potential to replicate Bitcoin's hundredfold increase over the next few years.

Dubai Summit Speech: At the beginning of December 2025 during the Binance Blockchain Week, Tom Lee once again astonishingly proclaimed a bull market, predicting that Bitcoin could skyrocket to $250,000 in "a few months," and bluntly stated that the then price of Ethereum around $3,000 was "severely undervalued."

He pointed out through historical data comparisons that if the ETH/BTC ratio returns to its eight-year average level (around 0.07), the ETH price could reach $12,000; if it returns to the 2021 relative high point (around 0.16), then ETH could rise to $22,000; and in an extreme scenario, if the ETH/BTC ratio rises to 0.25, theoretically, the valuation of Ethereum could surpass $60,000.

Short-Term All-Time High Expectation: Despite facing market volatility towards the end of the year, Tom Lee has not tempered his bullish rhetoric. In mid-December 2025, during an interview with CNBC, he stated, "I do not believe this upward trend has ended," and he bet on Bitcoin and Ethereum to reach a new all-time high by the end of January next year. At that time, Bitcoin had surpassed its 2021 high, while Ethereum was around $3,000, still about 40% below its $4,954 all-time high.

The above forecast list covers almost all major time points in 2025. On the unbiased Fundstrat analysis page, Tom Lee is labeled as a "Perma Bull," and every time he speaks, he sets higher price targets and more optimistic period outlooks for the market. However, these aggressive predictions are far from the actual trend. This series of facts has led the market to begin questioning the credibility of the "Wall Street Oracle" Tom Lee.

Who Is Tom Lee

Thomas Jong Lee, commonly known as Tom Lee, is a renowned American stock market strategist, research head, and financial commentator. He started on Wall Street in the 1990s, worked at Kidder Peabody and Salomon Smith Barney, joined J.P. Morgan in 1999, and became the Chief Equity Strategist in 2007.

In 2014, he co-founded the independent research firm Fundstrat Global Advisors and served as Head of Research, transitioning from a Wall Street strategist to a leader of an independent research firm, being considered one of the early Wall Street strategists to integrate Bitcoin into mainstream valuation discussions. In 2017, he released a report titled "A framework for valuing bitcoin as a substitute for gold," which first proposed that Bitcoin has the potential to partially replace gold as a store of value.

Due to the high media coverage of his research and viewpoints, Tom Lee is often seen in mainstream financial programs and events as the "Head of Research at Fundstrat" (including CNBC-related program/event pages and video content referencing his title). Since 2025, his influence has further extended to the "Ethereum Treasury" narrative: according to Reuters, after BitMine advanced Ethereum Treasury-related financing, Fundstrat's Thomas Lee joined the board to support its Ethereum-oriented treasury strategy. At the same time, Fundstrat continues to release market outlooks and opinion segments centered around Tom Lee through its own YouTube channel.

From Arrogance to Humility: Contrasting Publicly Bullish Calls with Internally Cautious Bearish Views

Tom Lee and his team's conflicting statements on different occasions have sparked industry discussions about their motivations and integrity. In response to recent controversies, Sean Farrell, Fundstrat's Head of Digital Asset Strategy, wrote a post stating that there are misconceptions about Fundstrat's research process.

He mentioned that Fundstrat has multiple analysts internally, each using an independent research framework and time horizon to serve different types of clients' objectives; Tom Lee's research is more geared towards traditional asset management firms and "low allocation" investors (typically allocating only 1%–5% of assets to BTC/ETH), emphasizing long-term discipline and structural trends, while he himself mainly serves portfolios with a higher proportion of crypto assets (around 20%+). However, when publicly making a bullish call on ETH, Tom Lee did not disclose that he was targeting the "1%–5% allocation to BTC/ETH" group.

Farrell further stated that their cautious baseline scenario for the first half of 2026 is part of risk management, not a shift to a bearish view on the long-term prospects of crypto. He believes the current market pricing leans towards being "almost perfect," but risks such as government shutdowns, trade volatility, uncertainty in AI capital expenditure, the change in the Fed Chair, among others, still exist. He also listed their historical performance, stating that their token portfolio has roughly tripled since mid-January 2023, while their crypto stock portfolio has risen about 230% since inception, with a relative BTC outperformance of about 40%. Within their respective lifespans, both have likely outperformed most liquid funds. However, this wording seems more like a way to address Bitmine's $3 billion paper loss and conflicting statements from the founder, hinting at a lack of transparency.

Epilogue: The Discrepancy Lies Not in the Issue Itself, But in Disclosure and Boundaries

The real point of contention here is not the existence of different frameworks within Fundstrat, but rather the lack of clear delineation and interest disclosure by the co-founder between public-facing communication and service-side.

Sean Farrell used the explanation of serving different types of clients to justify the contradictory statements, which may hold logically, but still raises three issues on the communication front:

1. When Tom Lee expresses strong optimism towards ETH in public videos and media interviews, the audience does not automatically assume that this is "only applicable to a small portion of a long-term portfolio discussion," nor do they inherently grasp the implied risk disclaimers, time horizons, and probability weighting. Tom Lee himself has not provided explicit clarification and scope on this.

2. The nature of FS Insight/Fundstrat's subscription model is "research monetization," with subscription prompts like "Start Free Trial" directly on the website and featuring Tom Lee in promotions. Tom Lee is a key figure at Fundstrat, prominently labeled as "Tom Lee, CFA / Head of Research" on the FS Insight page. As more traffic and subscriptions come from Tom Lee's public interviews in the media, how does the company make the public believe that "this is just expressing personal opinions"?

3. Public information indicates that Tom Lee also serves as the Chairman of the Board at BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR), a company focusing ETH in its treasury strategies. In this dual role, his continuous public advocacy for "long ETH" would naturally be perceived by the market as closely aligned with the affiliated entity's interests. For CFA charterholders, professional ethics also emphasize making "full and clear disclosures" regarding matters that could affect independence and objectivity.

Such disputes often involve compliance issues: Anti-Fraud and Conflict of Interest Disclosure. In the context of U.S. securities laws, Rule 10b-5 is a typical anti-fraud provision that centers on prohibiting material false or misleading statements in connection with securities trading.

Furthermore, the organizational structure of Fundstrat adds complexity to the dispute: Fundstrat Global Advisors underscores in its terms and disclosure documents that it is a research company, "not a registered investment advisor, nor a broker-dealer," and the subscription research is "for client use only." However, simultaneously, Fundstrat Capital LLC explicitly functions as a "SEC-registered investment advisor (RIA)" offering advisory services.

Considering that public interviews and the operation of the Fundstrat YouTube channel effectively take on a "customer acquisition/marketing" function, it raises another question: which content belongs to individual research dissemination and which content belongs to company marketing. If an institution's public video channel continues to release "bullish segments," while the subscription service side releases "bearish for the first half of the year" forecasts, and does not synchronously present key qualification criteria and risk frameworks in public communication, then it would at least constitute a selective presentation under information asymmetry.

This may not necessarily violate the law, but it will continue to erode the public's trust in research independence and credibility, and blur the boundaries of "research — marketing — narrative mobilization." For a research institution where reputation is one of its commercial cores, this trust cost will ultimately backfire on the brand itself.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more