Deep Dive into Aave’s Governance Dilemma and Broader Implications

By: crypto insight|2025/12/29 14:30:11
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Aave faces an intense community debate regarding control over its brand and assets, highlighting a key challenge in decentralized governance.
  • Ethereum’s upcoming “Glamsterdam” upgrade is designed to address issues like maximal extractable value (MEV) to promote fairness and transparency.
  • Bitcoin’s security against quantum computing is a topic of discussion, addressing the long-term viability of cryptocurrency against evolving threats.
  • EigenLayer introduces a governance proposal to enhance rewards and encourage participation, aligning incentives within its network.

WEEX Crypto News, 2025-12-29 06:06:08

In recent developments across the crypto sphere, several key stories have emerged that may redefine the landscape of blockchain governance, upgrades, and security as we edge closer to 2026. Among these, the heated debate within the Aave community over governance rights and brand control stands out, reflecting an evolving discourse on balance and power dynamics within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs).

Aave’s Governance Conundrum

The ongoing conflict within Aave is primarily centered on who should hold control over the protocol’s branding and associated assets, such as trademarks, domains, and social accounts. This issue underscores the broader tension between decentralized governance structures like DAOs and the centralized entities, such as Aave Labs, that develop the technology.

At the heart of this dispute is a significant question: who should ultimately steer the direction of a protocol that handles over $33 billion in locked assets? Aave’s integration of a trade execution tool, CoW Swap, which resulted in fees being funneled to Aave Labs rather than the DAO’s treasury, has sparked this debate. Critics argue that this situation highlights a deeper issue regarding unilateral control by private companies in a space meant to be decentralized.

The Ideological Divide

Proponents of a more DAO-centric approach believe that governance rights should squarely align with those holding economic risk—i.e., the token holders. They argue this alignment would ensure the Aave brand is truly representative of a collective effort rather than the vision of a single company. Meanwhile, supporters of centralized control maintain that developers—typically holding the most technical expertise—are better positioned to oversee development and partnerships, suggesting that transferring brand control might slow progress and blur accountability.

This debate is symptomatic of a larger ideological battle within the crypto world. As systems become complex and their influence and value grow, reconciling decentralized ideals with efficient execution becomes increasingly challenging.

Ethereum’s Glamsterdam Upgrade: A Shift Towards Fairness

Ethereum’s developers continue pushing the envelope with their planned “Glamsterdam” upgrade—a dual strategy aimed at addressing key vulnerabilities and inefficiencies in blockchain operations. “Glamsterdam” is a combination of upgrades to Ethereum’s execution and consensus layers, namely, the Amsterdam upgrade and the Gloas update.

Central to Glamsterdam is the proposal for enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS), which is designed to insert a vital boundary between block builders and proposers, minimizing centralized control over transactions. This separation helps to prevent potential manipulation by eliminating the builder’s ability to reorder transactions for maximal extractable value (MEV), a practice that can compromise the consistent fairness of blockchain transactions. By integrating this directly into Ethereum’s protocol, the reliance on off-chain services is reduced, subsequently enhancing reliability and decentralization.

Looking Ahead

Communities and developers in the Ethereum network are keenly anticipating this upgrade for its potential to set new standards in blockchain transparency and trust. The shift towards fairer MEV practices is expected to secure Ethereum’s position as a leading platform for decentralized applications, thus addressing one of the blockchain’s persistent critique-points.

Bitcoin and the Quantum Computing Challenge

In the realm of Bitcoin, the potential threat posed by quantum computing has transitioned from “if” to “when” and “how long” to prepare. Bitcoin developer, Jameson Lopp, emphasizes that although quantum computers are not an immediate threat to Bitcoin’s security, the process of adapting the network to withstand potential attacks is complex and time-consuming. According to him, required defensive measures could take between five to ten years to fully implement.

The Importance of Preparedness

Bitcoin’s value heavily relies on market confidence in its ability to perform as a long-term asset. As institutional capital begins to invest with a multi-year horizon, even the distant prospect of quantum threats necessitates preemptive strategy formulation. While developers continue observing quantum advancements, understanding that modifications to Bitcoin’s protocol require consensus and significant time investment is vital.

EigenLayer: Enhancing Governance and Incentives

EigenLayer, a protocol capitalizing on restaking mechanics, introduces a fresh governance proposal designed to enrich token holder rewards and engage active network participants. The focus of this proposal is on expanding incentives through a structured fee model, channeling revenue from network services back to EIGEN token holders.

Such a model posits that by aligning incentives with real usage and demand for EigenLayer’s security, stakers and operators backing active services can enjoy enhanced returns. This approach seeks to strengthen EigenLayer’s ecosystem by marrying effective tokenomics with functional governance, aiming to foster a thriving environment for decentralized operations.

Broader Implications

EigenLayer’s approach epitomizes a growing trend across blockchain platforms: optimizing economic incentives to promote greater engagement and sustainability. This ensures that the network remains robust and evolves in tandem with its users’ needs, setting a precedent for strategic innovation in decentralized finance systems.

In Other Noteworthy News

Alongside these critical narratives, several additional happenings within the crypto ecosystem are drawing attention. Upexi (UPXI), a company stationed in Tampa and notable for managing consumer brands and maintaining a significant Solana treasury, has recently moved to raise $1 billion through the issuance of various financial instruments. Meanwhile, El Salvador’s commendable economic growth, applauded by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), is notable as the country continues its systematic accumulation of Bitcoin, thereby reinforcing its stance as a pioneer among governments adopting cryptocurrency as a financial strategy.

In the realm of policy, Russia’s central bank is proposing new leadership, highlighting the economic and regulatory evolution surrounding cryptocurrencies. This conceptual framework aims to permit crypto trade under strict regulations, reflecting a nuanced approach by policymakers toward digital currency acceptance.

The Council of the European Union, in tandem, has given the green light to the European Central Bank’s exploration of a digital euro, a move that underscores the increasing potential of digital currencies on the global stage. With conditions to avoid economic imbalance, this exploration marks an acknowledgment of central bank digital currencies as both a tool for financial inclusion and an evolution of traditional monetary systems.

FAQs

What is causing the divide in the Aave community?

The division centers on governance control over the Aave protocol’s brand and assets between the decentralized governance model (DAO) and Aave Labs, the centralized developer. This reflects deeper qualms about decentralization versus central execution powers.

How will the Glamsterdam upgrade impact Ethereum?

The Glamsterdam upgrade, through Proposer-Builder Separation, aims to enhance fairness in transaction processing on Ethereum, addressing concerns about MEV and supporting robust decentralization.

Why is quantum computing a topic of concern for Bitcoin?

Quantum computing presents a potential future threat, as its encryption-breaking capabilities could compromise Bitcoin’s security. Developers anticipate a long-term preparation timeline to counteract such threats.

What changes has EigenLayer proposed?

EigenLayer plans to introduce a governance model to incentivize active participation by rewarding EIGEN token holders through a revenue-sharing framework focused on network activity and fee creation.

How are governments and organizations responding to cryptocurrency advancements?

Many governments, like Russia and entities like the EU, are taking strategic steps to regulate and incorporate cryptocurrencies within financial systems, reflecting a broader acceptance and adaptation to digital economic models.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more