2025 Token Postmortem: 84% Peak at Launch, High-Cap Project Turns into a "Rug Pull" Epicenter?

By: blockbeats|2025/12/23 20:30:04
0
Share
copy
Original Title: 113 token launches. $1.3B+ raised. One pattern that kills all
Original Source: Solus Group
Original Translation: CryptoLeo, Odaily Planet Daily

Editor's Note: In a recent analysis, analyst Ash stated in a popular post that out of over 100 new tokens from 2025 TGEs, 84.7% of tokens had an FDV lower than the FDV at TGE. The median FDV of these tokens dropped by 71% from issuance (median market cap drop of 67%). Only 15% of tokens saw an increase in FDV from TGE. Overall, most tokens from 2025 new issuances fall under the category of "peak price at TGE."

Building on this data, an even more interesting article (from Solus Group) was found, which analyzed the trends post-TGE of 113 tokens from 2025, along with their funding status, community activity, and correlation with exchange listings. The research revealed that factors commonly seen as indicators of project quality such as high funding, active community, and exchange listings have little impact on the token's performance. While we used to select good projects based on these criteria, this assessment model for projects in 2025 has "broken down." One particularly thought-provoking set of data is as follows:

-Projects with a trading price lower than the IDO price had an average revenue of $1.36 million.

-Projects with a trading price higher than the IDO price had an average revenue of $0.79 million.

However, all these projects received support from venture capitalists, indicating that the market values hype over actual performance, stories over data, and promises over the product itself. Web3 can no longer pretend that "all is well" or refer to bot traffic as "growth." Of course, this article only draws some statistical conclusions and is not a universal standard for all projects. Good projects and large funding can still represent the direction of the crypto industry.

A $2 million funding, participation from top VCs, 500k community fans, listing on major exchanges, unprecedented excitement on the first day of trading, jubilation on Discord, and a celebratory atmosphere all over social media.

2025 Token Postmortem: 84% Peak at Launch, High-Cap Project Turns into a

In a previous article, we revealed the truth behind a 0.96x ROI: by 2025, on average, each token was actually dead on arrival, proving the system to be invalid. Now, we have analyzed 113 token launch cases since 2025, providing irrefutable data to support this — data that most founders dare not confront.

The research results are shocking: large funding amounts are ineffective, a massive community is irrelevant, and every variable you optimize for holds no statistical value.

But beneath the surface lies a more sinister truth that continues to plague many founders: the current state of project revenue is a bearish signal, where the token price of profitable projects is lower than that of non-profitable ones, a dynamic that is life or death. If profitability continues to be punished while speculation is rewarded, the entire industry will not survive.

Editor's note: Previously, Solus Group published data revealing that, for projects launched in 2025, the average Token Generation Event (TGE) project had a 0.96 ROI from day one, indicating that their product launch was in a loss-making position from day one.

Founder Data Trap: Funding Paradox, High Funding Does Not Equal Token Advantage

Correlation between funding and token performance: 0.04, statistically negligible.

Projects with $10 million in funding perform identically to those with $1 million in funding. The chart above proves this — regardless of the funding amount, the distribution of tokens within the ROI range is random. Top-performing projects such as Myshell, B² Network, Bubblemaps, Mind Network, Particle Network, and Creator.Bid (which saw valuations increase 10x to 30x at their ATH) raised between $300,000 and $3 million. Meanwhile, projects like Boundless and Analog, which raised over $10 million, only saw a multiple of around 1x.

Current token performance is even worse, with most tokens, regardless of funding size, having an ROI of less than 1x. For example, tokens from projects with funding between $5 million and $100 million have an ROI of 0.1x to 0.7x (e.g., Fleek, Pipe Network, Sahara AI), similar to projects with minimal funding.

The fact is: Large fundraising accelerates project token death.

The least funded projects ($300,000 to $5 million) have a higher return on investment for every dollar raised, they execute faster, pivot cheaper, and don't get drowned in the quarterly VC token unlock schedule, where a large token unlock destroys project gains.

If you're pursuing $10 million for the sake of "competition," you are preparing to fail.

Fan Myth: A large project community is also just a "paper tiger"

A social media following of 500,000 and 50,000, the stats are identical.

Correlation: 0.08 (Token ATH) and -0.06 (Token current state)

Data shows that audience size has no predictive value on token performance, projects with a large fan base have mixed performance - some skyrocket, some plummet, small-audience projects do the same with no trend, no pattern, and no correlation.

The Discord group you are in is not a community, it's a speculative audience waiting to leave.

Reality is: Price dictates community development, not community drives price.

When the price crashes, followers disappear. The chart proves this - the bottom-left quadrant (decreasing followers + price drop) is very dense. When the price surges, followers sometimes grow with it, but it's not consistent.

This means:

Your "active community" has never really cared about the product - they care about the token price movement. Once the token performance disappoints, they disappear, community growth is a lagging indicator, not a leading one.

This is not just theory, but a viewpoint publicly expressed by @belizardd (Researcher/Trader/KOL):

Most people are here purely for speculation, not the product itself. We find few protocols that perform well post TGE, and mostly, those protocols have low initial token FDV, raised low amounts, and generous airdrops. Frankly, I wouldn't blindly ape into anything right now. Risk/reward is not worth it, I'm just waiting for the market to pick up.

Speculators know the game is up. They are in a wait-and-see mode. Meanwhile, the founder keeps pouring 60% of the budget into Discord bots, Twitter giveaways, and KOL promotions — burning money on statistically irrelevant metrics.

The real question is: "If the token crashes 50% tomorrow, how many people will still be around?"

Answer: Almost none.

Token Price Trap, Beware of Overvaluation/Undervaluation

Median investment return calculated based on token listing price:

· Below $0.01: 0.1x (lose 90%)

· $0.01 to $0.05: 0.8x (survivable range)

· $0.05 to $0.50: 0.5x (lose 50%)

· Above $0.50: 0.09x (lose 91%)

Let's reiterate:

A token issuance price below $0.01 does not make your token "easier to get into," it just makes you a low-price coin attracting profit-driven capital that pumps and dumps quickly.

Pricing above $0.50 does not make your token a "premium token," it just looks overvalued. An overly high token price will kill the retail market, and whales won't buy it.

The $0.01 to $0.05 token price range is the only survivable pricing range, which is both high enough to signal legitimacy of the project and low enough to leave room for upward movement. Within this price range, out of 97 projects, only 42 had a positive median token performance.

If your tokenomics peg your valuation at $0.003 or $1.20, stop recalibrating. The data indicates your project has already failed.

Industry Landscape: Stop Building for 2021

Loser: Gaming

Average ATH ROI: 4.46x (Lowest)

Current Median ROI: 0.52x

GameFi tokens are like lottery tickets, played once and then forgotten forever.

Trap: DeFi

Average ATH ROI: 5.09x (Looking Good)

Current Median ROI: 0.2x (Disastrous)

The early price surge of DeFi followed by a crash has been more extreme than any other sector, highlighting the brutal gap between hype and reality.

Winner: AI

Average ATH ROI: 5.99x (Highest Surge)

Current Median ROI: 0.70x (Best Retention)

AI token prices have surged and held steady. This trend shows persistence, drawing in funds accordingly.

If you are developing GameFi, your execution needs to be ten times above average to achieve mediocre results. If you are in DeFi, be prepared for rapid rises and steep falls. In the AI sector, the market will provide opportunities, but only if you can deliver. The demands in infrastructure are even more stringent: compared to standard decentralized applications like AI agents, you will consume more time and resources, yet your current ROI median is slightly below the universally scorned GameFi field.

Data doesn't care about the project you are passionate about.

IDO/IEO Data Overview: A Good Platform Can't Save a Project

You spent months building connections, only to secure a seat on Binance Launchpad or a first-tier IDO allocation, thinking that passing through platform filters meant protection. The data shows otherwise.

IDO Platforms: Nearly all projects are in a loss position

Only one project across 5 IDO platforms has a return rate of +14.6%, that's it. The return rates for all other projects range from -70% to -93%.

The so-called "Advanced Launchpad" did not provide protection for buyers, but rather offered them a way to lose money.

IEO Platform: The Ultimate Manifestation of Survival Bias

The Binance wallet displayed a return rate of 11x. It looks unbelievable, but it was only issued 3 times, with a too small sample size. MEXC showed a return rate of +122.8% over 14 issuances—a larger sample, but still an outlier. All other projects? Underperformed. Bybit's IEO token had a loss rate of 38%, with other projects experiencing even more severe losses.

This proves:

Platform selection is like a lottery with a better branding effect. The victory of a few outlier data distorts the average, and post-token-distribution drops dominate a large number of tokens. The "curation service" fee you pay—whether through relationships, listing fees, or token allocation—cannot reliably protect token ROI.

Platforms cannot save bad tokens, nor can they help good ones.

Reflecting on 2025, Looking Ahead to 2026

The projects based on 2025 have failed at every level.

Layer Zero: Foundation

Problem: "Speculative Tokenomics." Selling tokens recklessly to illiquid markets without an organic revenue model to absorb the shock.

Layer One: Fundraising

Problem: "Edit first on the PDF, then deal with it later."

Layer Two: Marketing

Problem: KOL model, users hired through paid armies who disappear without a trace once the payments stop.

Layer Three: Liquidity

Problem: Assuming liquidity will increase with hype, which is not the case—institutional investors wait for evidence.

Layer Four: User Retention

Problem: Zero retention infrastructure. The "project community" is 10,000 Telegram users who will abandon you within 90 days.

2026 should not replay old games. Behind all this lies a deeper problem—the infrastructure is indeed important, and even with perfect infrastructure, timing is everything. As Ivan Paskar, Growth Lead at Altius Labs, said:

A token cannot fix broken things — they will amplify reality. Right Timing = Momentum Amplification. Wrong Timing = Years of Effort Instantly Gone. Most teams don't fail in token design, they fail in misjudging the phase & macro environment they're in, timing is not a detail, it's everything.

What Projects Should Do in 2026

Survival isn't about following the old script, it's about crafting a new script.

1. Meticulous Design

Target raise between $300K to $5M, the best ROI per dollar invested is here. More funds = more problems.

2. Survival Cost

Initial price between $0.01 to $0.05. Other prices struggle to survive. If your tokenomics don't fit in this range, they have issues.

3. Product First, Token Second

If you can't explain why your token exists in one sentence, then it doesn't. Utility before speculation.

4. Ignore Vanity Metrics

Follower count is a distraction, wallet activity, retention rate, and per-user income are the key metrics.

5. Industry Realism

Understand your industry's failure rate before writing code. GameFi needs twice the execution efficiency to break even. AI has a tailwind — as long as you can deliver.

6. Integrate or Die

The era of mergers and acquisitions is approaching. If you can't expand independently, find an acquirer. Acquisition is not a failure, it's a smart move.

These six principles are critical. But the truth is: the standard script is outdated, there's no longer a one-size-fits-all standard mode.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more